Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: fix keepalive assert check #535

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2024
Merged

test: fix keepalive assert check #535

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2024

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Sep 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new endpoint /digestAuth2 for enhanced security through Digest Authentication.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in tests to prevent runtime errors related to missing dispatcher pool stats.
  • Tests

    • Added a test case to verify server response for invalid username and password in digest authentication.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new endpoint /digestAuth2 to the server, implementing Digest Authentication. The server validates the Authorization header, responding with appropriate status codes based on its presence and validity. Additionally, the keep-alive-header.test.ts file enhances error handling in tests by checking for the existence of dispatcher pool stats before accessing properties. A new test case is added in options.digestAuth.test.ts to verify the server's response to invalid authentication credentials.

Changes

File Change Summary
test/fixtures/server.ts Added a new endpoint /digestAuth2 for handling Digest Authentication with appropriate responses.
test/keep-alive-header.test.ts Added conditional checks to prevent runtime errors when accessing dispatcher pool stats.
test/options.digestAuth.test.ts Added a test case to verify server response for invalid username and password in digest authentication.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug

Poem

In the server's heart, a new path does bloom,
/digestAuth2, where security finds room.
With checks and tests, we guard the gate,
Invalid tries met with a 401 fate.
Hopping along, our code's now more bright,
A safer place for all, in the digital night! 🐇✨

Tip

OpenAI O1 model for chat
  • We have deployed OpenAI's latest O1 model for chat.
  • OpenAI claims that this model has superior reasoning capabilities than their GPT-4o model.
  • Please share any feedback with us in the discussions post.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Sep 14, 2024

Open in Stackblitz

yarn add https://pkg.pr.new/node-modules/urllib@535.tgz

commit: 6f3f9f0

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.47%. Comparing base (d52a3e0) to head (6f3f9f0).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #535      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.87%   97.47%   -0.41%     
==========================================
  Files          10        7       -3     
  Lines        1600      990     -610     
  Branches      257      260       +3     
==========================================
- Hits         1566      965     -601     
+ Misses         30       21       -9     
  Partials        4        4              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77eee5b and 6f3f9f0.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • test/fixtures/server.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/keep-alive-header.test.ts (2 hunks)
  • test/options.digestAuth.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
test/options.digestAuth.test.ts (1)

54-63: LGTM!

The new test case should auth fail on x-www-authenticate is a valuable addition to the test suite. It covers the important scenario of handling authentication failures when invalid credentials are provided.

The test case follows the AAA pattern, making it easy to understand and maintain. The assertions correctly verify the expected status code (401) and error message ("authorization invaild") for the failure scenario.

By testing the negative path, this test case improves the robustness of the authentication logic and ensures that the application behaves correctly when faced with invalid input.

Great job on enhancing the test coverage! 👍

test/keep-alive-header.test.ts (2)

45-49: LGTM!

The conditional check is a good defensive programming practice to prevent potential runtime errors. The assertions seem reasonable and match the expected state after a response is received.


139-143: LGTM!

The conditional check is a good defensive programming practice. The assertions seem reasonable and match the expected state after sleeping for the keepalive timeout duration.

Comment on lines +103 to +122
if (pathname === '/digestAuth2') {
const authorization = req.headers.authorization;
if (!authorization) {
res.setHeader('x-www-authenticate', 'Digest realm="testrealm@urllib.com", qop="auth,auth-int", nonce="dcd98b7102dd2f0e8b11d0f600bfb0c093", opaque="5ccc069c403ebaf9f0171e9517f40e41"');
res.statusCode = 401;
return res.end(JSON.stringify({
error: 'authorization required',
}));
}
if (!authorization.includes('Digest username="user"')) {
res.setHeader('x-www-authenticate', 'Digest realm="testrealm@urllib.com", qop="auth,auth-int", nonce="dcd98b7102dd2f0e8b11d0f600bfb0c093", opaque="5ccc069c403ebaf9f0171e9517f40e41"');
res.statusCode = 401;
return res.end(JSON.stringify({
error: 'authorization invaild',
}));
}
return res.end(JSON.stringify({
authorization,
}));
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! The new /digestAuth2 endpoint implementation looks good.

The Digest Authentication flow is correctly implemented, handling the cases when the Authorization header is missing or invalid, and responding with the appropriate status codes and headers.

Consider refactoring the common logic between the /digestAuth and /digestAuth2 endpoints to avoid code duplication. You can extract the shared logic into a separate function that takes the header name (www-authenticate or x-www-authenticate) as a parameter.

For example:

function handleDigestAuth(req: IncomingMessage, res: ServerResponse, headerName: string) {
  const authorization = req.headers.authorization;
  if (!authorization) {
    res.setHeader(headerName, 'Digest realm="testrealm@urllib.com", qop="auth,auth-int", nonce="dcd98b7102dd2f0e8b11d0f600bfb0c093", opaque="5ccc069c403ebaf9f0171e9517f40e41"');
    res.statusCode = 401;
    return res.end(JSON.stringify({
      error: 'authorization required',
    }));
  }
  if (!authorization.includes('Digest username="user"')) {
    res.setHeader(headerName, 'Digest realm="testrealm@urllib.com", qop="auth,auth-int", nonce="dcd98b7102dd2f0e8b11d0f600bfb0c093", opaque="5ccc069c403ebaf9f0171e9517f40e41"');
    res.statusCode = 401;
    return res.end(JSON.stringify({
      error: 'authorization invalid',
    }));
  }
  return res.end(JSON.stringify({
    authorization,
  }));
}

// Usage in the `/digestAuth` endpoint
if (pathname === '/digestAuth') {
  return handleDigestAuth(req, res, 'www-authenticate');
}

// Usage in the `/digestAuth2` endpoint  
if (pathname === '/digestAuth2') {
  return handleDigestAuth(req, res, 'x-www-authenticate');
}

This refactoring will make the code more maintainable and easier to update in the future if any changes are needed to the Digest Authentication logic.

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 1a67bf6 into master Sep 14, 2024
20 of 22 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the fix-test branch September 14, 2024 06:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant