Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add hostname for checkAddress #525

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

killagu
Copy link
Member

@killagu killagu commented Jul 8, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced hostname validation in address checking for enhanced security.
  • Tests

    • Added a new test case to verify hostname validation logic.

@killagu killagu requested a review from fengmk2 July 8, 2024 06:54
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces modifications to the HttpAgent.ts file, where the CheckAddressFunction type now includes an additional hostname parameter. This change impacts the method calls for checkAddress within the HttpAgent class. Correspondingly, a new test case has been added in HttpClient.test.ts to validate hostname functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/HttpAgent.ts Updated CheckAddressFunction type to include hostname parameter and adjusted related calls.
test/HttpClient.test.ts Added a new test case to verify the hostname validation within the HttpClient class.

Poem

A hostname now joins the game,
To check addresses, a new acclaim.
HttpAgent stands tall and bright,
With added tests, it takes flight.
A little change, a code delight,
Ensuring all works just right.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

commit: f7bc9bb

urllib

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/node-modules/urllib@525


templates

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.86%. Comparing base (cbb06e7) to head (f7bc9bb).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #525   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.86%   97.86%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        1596     1596           
  Branches      256      256           
=======================================
  Hits         1562     1562           
  Misses         30       30           
  Partials        4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cbb06e7 and a0fa0eb.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/HttpAgent.ts (3 hunks)
  • test/HttpClient.test.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
src/HttpAgent.ts (2)

9-9: Type definition update approved.

The CheckAddressFunction type definition now includes the hostname parameter, which is correctly added.


82-82: Function call update approved.

The #checkAddress function is now called with the hostname parameter, which is correctly passed.

test/HttpClient.test.ts (1)

336-351: New test case approved.

The new test case correctly validates the hostname checking functionality within the HttpClient class.

Comment on lines +49 to +55
if (!options.checkAddress(address, family, hostname)) {
err = new IllegalAddressError(hostname, address, family);
}
} else if (Array.isArray(address)) {
const addresses = address as { address: string, family: number }[];
for (const addr of addresses) {
if (!options.checkAddress(addr.address, addr.family)) {
if (!options.checkAddress(addr.address, addr.family, hostname)) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Function call update required.

Some instances of the checkAddress function do not match the new signature with the hostname parameter. Please update the following locations:

  • test/HttpClient.test.ts: lines where checkAddress is called without the hostname parameter.
  • src/HttpClient.ts: lines where checkAddress is called without the hostname parameter.
Analysis chain

Function call update approved.

The checkAddress function is now called with the hostname parameter, which is correctly passed in both instances.

However, ensure that all function calls to checkAddress match the new signature.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `checkAddress` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type-add 'ts' --type-add 'tsx' --type ts,tsx 'checkAddress'

Length of output: 120


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `checkAddress` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type ts,tsx 'checkAddress'

Length of output: 106


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `checkAddress` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type ts --type tsx 'checkAddress'

Length of output: 1249

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a0fa0eb and a2070f4.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/HttpAgent.ts (3 hunks)
  • test/HttpClient.test.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/HttpAgent.ts
  • test/HttpClient.test.ts

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2070f4 and f7bc9bb.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/HttpAgent.ts (3 hunks)
  • test/HttpClient.test.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/HttpAgent.ts
  • test/HttpClient.test.ts

@killagu killagu requested review from gxkl and akitaSummer July 8, 2024 13:18
Copy link

@gxkl gxkl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gxkl gxkl merged commit 88b6e56 into master Jul 8, 2024
20 checks passed
@gxkl gxkl deleted the feat/checkAddress_hostname branch July 8, 2024 13:38
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
[skip ci]

## [4.2.0](v4.1.0...v4.2.0) (2024-07-08)

### Features

* add hostname for checkAddress ([#525](#525)) ([88b6e56](88b6e56))
killagu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced hostname validation in address checking for enhanced
security.
  
- **Tests**
  - Added a new test case to verify hostname validation logic.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced hostname validation in address checking for enhanced
security.
  
- **Tests**
  - Added a new test case to verify hostname validation logic.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
[skip ci]

## [3.27.0](v3.26.0...v3.27.0) (2024-07-08)

### Features

* add hostname for checkAddress ([#525](#525)) ([#528](#528)) ([0022641](0022641))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants