Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: improve fast_forward docs #299

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2023
Merged

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Sep 11, 2023

Closes #229

@ghost ghost marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2023 15:46
Copy link
Collaborator

@frol frol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At very least, the docs for fast_forward should indicate that any receipts that are scheduled and have not been executed will not be progressed during this call, I think.

I think this requirement is fulfilled, but we may get back to it in the context of more end-to-end DevX to make sure that the function name is not misleading (we cannot expect developers to read all the documentation)

@frol frol merged commit 482c194 into near:main Sep 12, 2023
3 checks passed
@ghost ghost deleted the chore/fast_forward-docs branch October 3, 2023 16:06
@frol frol mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fast_forward misleading name
1 participant