Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix comparison against wrong constant #1960

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2017

Conversation

fcrisciani
Copy link

The comparison was against the wrong constant value.
As described in the comment the check is there to guarantee
to not propagate events realted to stale deleted elements

Signed-off-by: Flavio Crisciani flavio.crisciani@docker.com

The comparison was against the wrong constant value.
As described in the comment the check is there to guarantee
to not propagate events realted to stale deleted elements

Signed-off-by: Flavio Crisciani <flavio.crisciani@docker.com>
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@1b42826). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1960   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   37.92%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      137           
  Lines             ?    27290           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    10349           
  Misses            ?    15669           
  Partials          ?     1272
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
networkdb/delegate.go 70.07% <0%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1b42826...6f11d29. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@mavenugo mavenugo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants