Should context strings apply to multiple forms if there are no line breaks?

[matthewdowney]

^:rct/test
(comment
  ;; Literal assertions with =>
  (range 3) ;=> (0 1 2)
  (+ 5 5) ;; => 10

  ;; Pattern matching assertions with =>>
  (range 3) ;=>> '(0 1 ...)
  (+ 5 5) ;=>> int?

For example, it seems like "Literal assertions with =>" should apply to the first two forms. Maybe this is "too smart" though.

[matthewdowney]

Example of the semantics I landed on here:

rich-comment-tests/test/com/mjdowney/rich_comment_tests_test.clj

Lines 21 to 45 in 46a3c92

	(deftest context-strings-test
	(m/assert
	'{(* 0 0) ""
	(+ 1 1) ";; Test for\n;; addition"
	(+ 2 2) ";; Test for\n;; addition"
	(* 1 1) ""
	(* 2 3) ""
	(* 2 2) ";; Squares\n;; and such"
	(* 3 3) ";; Squares\n;; and such\n; 3 squared"}
	(ctx-strings
	"(* 0 0) ;=> 0
	;; Test for
	;; addition
	(+ 1 1) ;=> 2
	(+ 2 2) ;=> 4
	(* 1 1) ;=> 1
	(* 2 3) ;=> 6
	;; Squares
	;; and such
	(* 2 2) ;=> 4
	; 3 squared
	(* 3 3) ;=> 9")))