fix: use external aggregate-error package to get better messages #73
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
swain
requested review from
nicolls1,
aecorredor,
jkdowdle,
epeters3 and
mdlavin
aecorredor
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2024
epeters3
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Currently, we're using the NodeJS built-in
AggregateError. We discovered today that this is problematic, because NodeJS does not include a useful.messagefield onAggregateErrorobjects. So, when they are logged, there is no helpful data.Using this external package gives us a more complete
messagefield, and thus more useful errors.