Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: cut 0.6.0 #170

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

*: cut 0.6.0 #170

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fabxc
Copy link
Contributor

@fabxc fabxc commented Jul 11, 2017

@alamaison


This change is Reviewable

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 11, 2017
@brancz
Copy link
Member

brancz commented Jul 17, 2017

I guess it doesn't hurt us to do a v0.6.0 release before the GA. I still have to catch up a bit from vacation, but generally I'm ok with this.

@samuelmanzer
Copy link
Contributor

Yes pls :) Very excited to use Job/CronJob metrics that were added since last release

@2rs2ts
Copy link

2rs2ts commented Jul 27, 2017

I would love a release ASAP so I can get #175 without having to build this project myself :)

@brancz
Copy link
Member

brancz commented Jul 27, 2017

Google is currently performing scalability tests, so we might skip 0.6 and go to 1.0 directly as the results are looking pretty good. We'll have an update soon!

#124 (comment)

@2rs2ts
Copy link

2rs2ts commented Jul 28, 2017

What would be the minimum ETA for a hypothetical 0.6 versus 1.0?

@brancz
Copy link
Member

brancz commented Aug 2, 2017

This PR is outdated so I'll close it here. We're still trying to figure out how to go 1.0/GA. I'm trying to resolve this and get a new release out as soon as I can. Hang in there! 🙂

@brancz brancz closed this Aug 2, 2017
@brancz brancz deleted the cut060 branch August 2, 2017 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants