Move TaintBasedEvictions GA kep from scheduling to node

[damemi]

This was erroneously merged under sig-scheduling, but it should be under sig-node

See kubernetes/kubernetes#87487 (comment)

/sig node

[damemi]

/cc @ahg-g @Huang-Wei
Do you have a link to the comment where we pointed out that this should be moved? I seem to have lost it

[ahg-g]

/cc @ahg-g @Huang-Wei
Do you have a link to the comment where we pointed out that this should be moved? I seem to have lost it

We talked about it offline. kubernetes/kubernetes#87487 (comment)

The approving sig is sig-node so naturally it should be placed under sig-node KEPs.

[damemi]

Does this need to merge by enhancement freeze (tomorrow)? Technically this KEP already merged and passed the enhancement freeze requirements, it's just under the wrong folder, right?

[damemi]

Other discussion that this would be better suited under sig-apps: kubernetes/kubernetes#87427 (comment)

[fengzixu]

Other discussion that this would be better suited under sig-apps: kubernetes/kubernetes#87427 (comment)

Ok. Got it

[damemi]

We've decided to keep this under sig-node (kubernetes/kubernetes#87427 (comment)). So, bumping, can this merge?

[damemi]

Bumping, can this be merged to move the KEP to sig-node? I believe we've reached a consensus at this point that this should be there

[damemi]

/assign @derekwaynecarr
Can you approve this move? Currently this blocks the 3 PRs that are ready to get this enhancement merged by code freeze

[derekwaynecarr]

/approve
/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: damemi, derekwaynecarr

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• keps/sig-node/OWNERS [derekwaynecarr]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment