You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm separating this issue out from #165 (comment) to be able to track this independently of the CSIP88 issue.
As mentioned there, with packages following version 2.1.0 of the spec, a missing label on the first CSIP structMap division leads to a NullPointerException:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.roda_project.commons_ip2.validator.component.structuralMapComponent.StructuralMapComponentValidator.validateCSIP86(StructuralMapComponentValidator.java:615)
at org.roda_project.commons_ip2.validator.component.structuralMapComponent.StructuralMapComponentValidator.validate(StructuralMapComponentValidator.java:92)
at org.roda_project.commons_ip2.validator.EARKSIPValidator.validateComponents(EARKSIPValidator.java:183)
at org.roda_project.commons_ip2.validator.EARKSIPValidator.validateRootMets(EARKSIPValidator.java:275)
at org.roda_project.commons_ip2.validator.EARKSIPValidator.validate(EARKSIPValidator.java:159)
at org.roda_project.commons_ip2.validator.CLI.CLIValidator.validate(CLIValidator.java:213)
at org.roda_project.commons_ip2.validator.CLI.CLIValidator.start(CLIValidator.java:157)
at org.roda_project.commons_ip2.validator.CLI.Main.main(Main.java:30)
While the exception needs to fixed either way, assuming validation against version 2.0.4 of the spec even with a label present the specific value that's expected for the is "CSIP" where the OBJID value would have been correct. This is currently true for CSIP86, CSIP88 and CSIP105-112.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm separating this issue out from #165 (comment) to be able to track this independently of the CSIP88 issue.
As mentioned there, with packages following version 2.1.0 of the spec, a missing label on the first CSIP structMap division leads to a NullPointerException:
While the exception needs to fixed either way, assuming validation against version 2.0.4 of the spec even with a label present the specific value that's expected for the is "CSIP" where the
OBJID
value would have been correct. This is currently true for CSIP86, CSIP88 and CSIP105-112.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: