Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "test ollama and litellm" #328

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2024
Merged

Revert "test ollama and litellm" #328

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2024

Conversation

jxnl
Copy link
Owner

@jxnl jxnl commented Jan 6, 2024

Reverts #326

@jxnl jxnl marked this pull request as ready for review January 6, 2024 14:56
@jxnl jxnl merged commit 995f1cf into main Jan 6, 2024
9 of 12 checks passed
@jxnl jxnl deleted the revert-326-litellm-ollama branch January 6, 2024 14:56
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor formatting issue

Summary:

This PR reverts a previous commit, undoing changes in 'docs/concepts/patching.md' and 'instructor/patch.py', and deleting 'examples/ollama/run.py'.

Key points:

  • Reverted changes in 'docs/concepts/patching.md', removing a large section explaining different modes.
  • Deleted 'examples/ollama/run.py'.
  • Made minor adjustments in 'instructor/patch.py', mainly in formatting and condition handling.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

@@ -417,4 +417,4 @@ def apatch(client: AsyncOpenAI, mode: Mode = Mode.FUNCTIONS):
- `validation_context` parameter to validate the response using the pydantic model
- `strict` parameter to use strict json parsing
"""
return patch(client, mode=mode)
return patch(client, mode=mode)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a newline at the end of the file to adhere to best practices and ensure compatibility with all tools.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant