Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] clarify user-defined functions return scalars #2554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2021
Merged

Conversation

odow
Copy link
Member

@odow odow commented Apr 9, 2021

This came up again on Slack
image

@odow odow added Category: Nonlinear Related to nonlinear programming Type: Documentation labels Apr 9, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #2554 (d19090d) into master (b6d9ddf) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2554   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.17%   93.17%           
=======================================
  Files          44       44           
  Lines        5479     5479           
=======================================
  Hits         5105     5105           
  Misses        374      374           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b6d9ddf...d19090d. Read the comment docs.

@odow odow merged commit 635efee into master Apr 10, 2021
@odow odow deleted the odow-patch-1 branch April 10, 2021 04:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Category: Nonlinear Related to nonlinear programming Type: Documentation
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant