-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversion to webpack - part3 - routes isolation, module resolution, refactoring appStorage #188
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No new issues, please address my remaining comments and I feel I'm fine with the PR.
I addresses all our comments, please check them again. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just want to make sure the skin related code wasn't for custom CSS or branding? I haven't seen any of that in the frontend yet so maybe it was improperly labeled as the skin.
For what i remember, i discussed that with @thornbill, and he said something like the code was there but it never worked or something similar. That's why i proceeded with removing it. |
I think that we can re-implement skins later if we want to. Less code to maintain for now is good - we need a clean foundation for building up anyway. |
@vitorsemeano Looks like we have some conflicts, are you able to resolve those? |
I have merged the changes from upstream, but i think we should wait for PR #197 to be merged into upstream before this one. |
Darn @vitorsemeano #197 caused two more conflicts, able to double-check them? |
Can you check if the merge is ok? I didn't tested. I can only test later tonight. |
fb60011
to
ae828f7
Compare
After some mess in this branch trying to rebase it, i think i successfully managed to rebase it as intented. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You probably don't need to move apiclient since we should pull it out soon, but everything else looks good.
Here goes the part 3 of the webpack conversion. This PR focus on module resolution for webpack, and it also focus in some relevant topics:
I also tested this PR with android, fixing some issues.