-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use udev for partition UUID #320
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, so for my understanding we are changing from
volume UUID
topartition UUID
? If so, there are practical implications of this change?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really, they are the same uuid afaik, only this is worded weirdly by mentioning volume for some reason. On my local checks, the values given by lsblk were the same as the ones on udev.
I can check further tonight to confirm this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks, I'll also do my homework and learn a bit more about this area
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
UUID comment seems to confirm that this is indeed the partition UUID, probably the
Volume
name comes from also adding the MacOS UUID, which is the Volume UUID:UUID string
json:"uuid"// This would be volume UUID on macOS, PartUUID on linux, empty on Windows
And yes, this seems to be the same value as what blkid reports for PARTUUID. Note that there is also a
ID_PART_TABLE_UUID
which points to the disk UUID, which we should not confuse with this.And to further confirm that this is indeed the expected value, if you do a low lovel probe with blkid, it will show the actual
PART_ENTRY_UUID
value, which is mapped by udev to theID_PART_ENTRY_UUID
but for some reason is named different when presented to the user:And you can see that matches the actual udev contents:
And output without a low level probe:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @Itxaka this fully makes sense to me. I just need to spend some extra time to learn myself a bit more. I'll review ASAP but in general LGTM (and I totally, really like this direction!)