Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support W3C Trace Context headers #855

Closed
1 of 6 tasks
yurishkuro opened this issue May 31, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed
1 of 6 tasks

Support W3C Trace Context headers #855

yurishkuro opened this issue May 31, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement help wanted Features that maintainers are willing to accept but do not have cycles to implement meta-issue An tracking issue that requires work in other repos

Comments

@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

yurishkuro commented May 31, 2018

https://github.com/w3c/distributed-tracing

@yurishkuro yurishkuro added meta-issue An tracking issue that requires work in other repos client-libs enhancement help wanted Features that maintainers are willing to accept but do not have cycles to implement labels May 31, 2018
@yurishkuro yurishkuro mentioned this issue Jun 1, 2018
7 tasks
@trevnet
Copy link

trevnet commented Jun 8, 2018

+1 waiting on this so I can use jaeger for my services

@grounded042
Copy link

@yurishkuro are we also wanting to support the correlation context headers defined in that repo or just the trace context headers?

@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member Author

Correlation header is currently not finalized as people have disagreements. So I would skip it for now. It means that we still need another way of propagating the baggage.

@grounded042
Copy link

so when we add Jaeger baggage in as long as the other Jaeger clients implement the same propagation method for baggage for W3C we'll be good, but until they finalize the correlation header technically no one else will be able to use that baggage. I'm fine with that - we just have to make sure all the Jaeger clients implement baggage handling for W3C the same.

@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member Author

Per #3362, we're sunsetting Jaeger clients. OpenTelemetry already supports W3C.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement help wanted Features that maintainers are willing to accept but do not have cycles to implement meta-issue An tracking issue that requires work in other repos
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants