Source-based code coverage in nightly (rust-lang#725)

posts/inside-rust/2020-11-12-source-based-code-coverage.md

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Source-based code coverage in nightly
+author: Tyler Mandry
+team: The Compiler Team <https://www.rust-lang.org/governance/teams/compiler>
+---
+
+
+Support has landed in the nightly compiler for source-based code coverage,
+and we want your help testing it!
+
+
+# What is _source-based_ code coverage, exactly?
+
+You may already be familiar with code coverage, which shows you which lines
+of code execute. Code coverage is usually applied to tests to find out which
+code is actually being tested and which code isn’t.
+
+Nightly Rust already supports another kind of source code coverage, commonly
+called gcov, which relies on debug info to map from LLVM IR to lines of
+source code. Instrumentation is then added in the LLVM backend during code
+generation to count how many times each line is run.
+
+However, since LLVM doesn’t know exactly how Rust code is structured, there’s
+a lot lost in the translation between Rust source and LLVM IR. Line-level
+granularity is sometimes too coarse, and debug info can be unreliable,
+especially when building in release mode. The result is coverage reports that
+only show an approximation of what code actually executed.
+
+Source-based code coverage instrumentation is applied by the Rust compiler,
+not LLVM. This instrumentation is more precise because it's being done in
+MIR, which holds a mapping between the original Rust source code and the
+control-flow graph of the program.
+
+That means things like short-circuited conditionals, closures, and match
+guards are all precisely counted. And since instrumentation counters are
+injected as regular MIR statements, the compiler can further optimize the
+program without affecting coverage results.
+
+[![Comparison of gcov and source-based coverage results][comparison-img]][comparison-img]
+
+_Above: A comparison of the gcov (left) and source-based coverage (right)
+results. gcov highlights skipped lines, marked with #####, while source-based
+coverage highlights exact regions of code that were skipped. Note that on
+line 30, one boolean subexpression is short-circuited. This is surfaced by
+source-based coverage but not gcov._
+
+What this means is that source-based code coverage is both efficient and
+accurate. LLVM’s existing coverage tools ([llvm-profdata] and [llvm-cov])
+generate both coverage summaries and very fine-grained code regions, helping
+you find gaps in your testing coverage. What you do about that is up to you!
+
+[comparison-img]: /images/inside-rust/2020-11-12-source-based-code-coverage/comparison.png
+[llvm-profdata]: https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/llvm-profdata.html
+[llvm-cov]: https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/llvm-cov.html
+
+# Trying it out
+
+Work on the implementation [began back in April][MCP], and [many PRs
+later][PRs], it’s ready for you to try. All you need is a recent nightly and
+a tool to read the coverage reports.
+
+[Take a look at this guide to get started][guide]. If you spot any issues,
+please [report them]. It’s a huge help!
+
+Finally, if you try it out and it works well, we’d also like to hear from
+you! Come by the [Zulip stream] for this change or comment on the [feature
+request].
+
+[MCP]: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/278
+[PRs]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Arichkadel+is%3Aclosed+closed%3A%3C2020-11-06
+[guide]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/compiler-flags/source-based-code-coverage.html
+[report them]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/new/choose
+[Zulip stream]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/233931-t-compiler.2Fmajor-changes/topic/Implement.20LLVM-compatible.20source-based.20cod.20compiler-team.23278
+[feature request]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34701
+
+# Acknowledgements
+
+The implementation work was all done by Rich Kadel; thanks to him for all the
+amazing work he’s done. Thanks also to Wesley Wiser for helping with reviews,
+to Bob Wilson for lending his experience with LLVM's InstrProf coverage APIs,
+and to eddyb for their guidance in choosing a MIR-based approach.