Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add simulation test #422

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024
Merged

feat: add simulation test #422

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

dreamer-zq
Copy link
Contributor

@dreamer-zq dreamer-zq commented Jul 25, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced automated testing for simulation determinism through a new GitHub Actions workflow.
    • Added new simulation functions for various farming operations to enhance the testing framework.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in token swapping logic to gracefully manage unexpected conditions.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced comments and descriptions within new simulation functions for better clarity.
  • Chores

    • Added variables to build scripts for improved context and functionality.
    • Integrated a new Makefile for simulation testing targets to streamline testing processes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 25, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances the simulation project's testing framework by introducing a new GitHub Actions workflow and various simulation-related functionalities. Key changes include automated tests for application determinism, new simulation functions, and improved dependency management. The modifications aim to ensure consistent behavior and reliability across the application, enriching the overall development and testing experience.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/sims.yaml Introduced a new workflow for automated testing of simulation state determinism, running tests on pull requests.
Makefile, scripts/build/simulations.mk Added new inclusions and targets for simulation-related build processes.
e2e/go.mod, e2e/sim_test.go, e2e/suite.go Updated dependencies and introduced end-to-end simulation tests for validating application behavior and determinism.
modules/coinswap/simulation/genesis.go, operations.go Enhanced genesis state generation and modified logic for token distribution and error handling in simulation operations.
modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go, operations.go Improved validation steps in tests and added new simulation functions for farming operations, enhancing overall testing robustness and functionality.
scripts/build/build.mk Introduced new environment-related variables for better script context.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GitHubActions
    participant SimulationTests
    participant App

    Developer->>GitHubActions: Create Pull Request
    GitHubActions->>SimulationTests: Trigger Tests
    SimulationTests->>App: Run Tests for Determinism
    App->>SimulationTests: Return Test Results
    SimulationTests->>GitHubActions: Report Results
    GitHubActions->>Developer: Notify Completion
Loading

🐰 "In fields where we hop and play,
New tests have come to brighten the day.
With workflows set and scripts so neat,
Our code now dances, oh what a treat!
For every bug we chase and chase,
A rabbit's joy in this coding race!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 55f906f and 194ba3c.

Files selected for processing (11)
  • .github/workflows/sims.yaml (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
  • e2e/go.mod (2 hunks)
  • e2e/sim_test.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/suite.go (1 hunks)
  • modules/coinswap/simulation/genesis.go (1 hunks)
  • modules/coinswap/simulation/operations.go (2 hunks)
  • modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
  • modules/farm/simulation/operations.go (7 hunks)
  • scripts/build/build.mk (1 hunks)
  • scripts/build/simulations.mk (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Makefile
Additional comments not posted (28)
scripts/build/build.mk (2)

2-2: LGTM!

The addition of BINDIR dynamically references the Go binaries, which is a standard practice.


3-3: LGTM!

The addition of CURRENT_DIR captures the current working directory, which is useful for scripts that need to operate relative to the directory from which they are executed.

scripts/build/simulations.mk (4)

1-4: LGTM!

The test-sim-nondeterminism target is well-defined and uses appropriate parameters for the non-determinism test.


6-9: LGTM!

The test-sim-nondeterminism-fast target is well-defined and uses appropriate parameters for a quick non-determinism test.


11-14: LGTM!

The test-sim-import-export target is well-defined and uses appropriate parameters for the import/export simulation test.


16-19: LGTM!

The test-sim-after-import target is well-defined and uses appropriate parameters for the simulation-after-import test.

.github/workflows/sims.yaml (3)

5-15: LGTM!

The test-sim-nondeterminism-fast job is well-defined and uses appropriate steps for setting up the environment and running the test.


16-26: Verify if the job needs to be enabled.

The test-sim-import-export job is commented out. Verify if it needs to be enabled or if it is a work-in-progress.


27-37: Verify if the job needs to be enabled.

The test-sim-after-import job is commented out. Verify if it needs to be enabled or if it is a work-in-progress.

e2e/suite.go (2)

Line range hint 54-58:
LGTM!

The defaultDepinjectOptions function centralizes the creation of dependency injection options, improving code clarity and maintainability.


51-52: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to DepinjectOptions are tested to verify the new behavior.

Verification successful

Function usage verified and new behavior is being tested.

The new function defaultDepinjectOptions is being used in multiple test files, ensuring that the new behavior is covered by tests.

  • simapp/test_helpers.go
  • simapp/network.go
  • e2e/suite.go
  • e2e/sim_test.go
  • modules/*/keeper_test.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `DepinjectOptions` to ensure the new behavior is tested.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Occurrences of `DepinjectOptions`.
rg --type go -A 5 $'DepinjectOptions'

Length of output: 10463

modules/coinswap/simulation/genesis.go (1)

23-74: LGTM! But verify the generated parameters.

The RandomizedGenState function implementation is correct and aligns with the expected behavior.

However, ensure that the generated parameters are within the expected bounds and the error handling is robust.

e2e/go.mod (1)

9-9: LGTM! But verify the usage of the new dependency.

The changes in the dependency management are approved.

However, ensure that the new dependency is correctly utilized in the codebase.

Verification successful

The new dependency github.com/cometbft/cometbft-db v0.7.0 is correctly utilized in the codebase.

The dependency is imported and used in the following files:

  • simapp/test_helpers.go
  • simapp/app_v2.go
  • e2e/sim_test.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new dependency `github.com/cometbft/cometbft-db v0.7.0`.

# Test: Search for the dependency usage. Expect: Occurrences of `cometbft-db`.
rg --type go -A 5 $'cometbft-db'

Length of output: 1130

modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)

444-445: Ensure proper error handling for keeper.RewardInvariant.

The function now includes a call to keeper.RewardInvariant(suite.keeper)(ctx) and asserts that broken is False. Ensure that err is appropriately handled.

Verification successful

Ensure proper handling of the RewardInvariant function's return values.

The RewardInvariant function returns a string and a boolean, not an error. Ensure that the test correctly handles the string description and the boolean result.

  • modules/farm/keeper/keeper_test.go lines 444-445
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the error handling for `keeper.RewardInvariant`.

# Test: Search for the `RewardInvariant` function to understand its error handling.
rg --type go 'func RewardInvariant' -A 10

Length of output: 901

e2e/sim_test.go (5)

88-146: LGTM! Verify simulation setup and parameters.

The setup and simulation process looks correct. Ensure that the simulation parameters are appropriate for your use case.


148-339: LGTM! Verify import/export functionality and store comparison.

The import/export process and store comparison look correct. Ensure that the comparison logic is appropriate for your use case.


341-453: LGTM! Verify simulation setup and parameters after import.

The setup and simulation process after import looks correct. Ensure that the simulation parameters are appropriate for your use case.


457-534: LGTM! Verify determinism test setup and parameters.

The setup and determinism test process looks correct. Ensure that the test parameters are appropriate for your use case.


58-68: LGTM! Verify initialization process.

The initialization process looks correct. Ensure that the flags and default node home directory are appropriate for your use case.

modules/farm/simulation/operations.go (7)

Line range hint 107-239: LGTM! Verify pool creation simulation logic.

The pool creation simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.


Line range hint 240-391: LGTM! Verify pool adjustment simulation logic.

The pool adjustment simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.


Line range hint 392-498: LGTM! Verify staking simulation logic.

The staking simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.


Line range hint 499-603: LGTM! Verify unstaking simulation logic.

The unstaking simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.


Line range hint 604-682: LGTM! Verify harvesting simulation logic.

The harvesting simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.


Line range hint 683-742: LGTM! Verify pool destruction simulation logic.

The pool destruction simulation logic looks correct. Ensure that the logic covers all necessary scenarios and edge cases.


Line range hint 743-847: LGTM! Verify helper functions.

The helper functions for generating random values look correct. Ensure that they cover all necessary scenarios and edge cases.

modules/coinswap/simulation/operations.go (2)

944-946: Impact of reducing the random token amount.

The change from token.Amount.QuoRaw(2) to token.Amount.QuoRaw(4) reduces the maximum random amount that can be generated, which could affect the token distribution logic.

Ensure that this change aligns with the intended behavior of the simulation and does not negatively impact other parts of the system.


1005-1015: Improved error handling for negative soldTokenAmt.

The new conditional check for negative soldTokenAmt enhances error handling by ensuring that the function can gracefully manage situations where the computed amount does not meet the expected constraints. This improves the robustness of the token swapping logic.

@mitch1024 mitch1024 merged commit ef0885f into main Jul 25, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@mitch1024 mitch1024 deleted the dreamer/add-simulation branch July 25, 2024 05:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants