Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add ability to use custom zap core #114

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 29, 2021
Merged

feat: add ability to use custom zap core #114

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 29, 2021

Conversation

MDobak
Copy link
Contributor

@MDobak MDobak commented May 30, 2021

This PR adds the ability to replace the zap core with a custom one. It should solve the issue: #102.

I explained my reasoning for adding the SetPrimaryCore function in this comment: #102 (comment).

@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented May 30, 2021

Thank you for submitting this PR!
A maintainer will be here shortly to review it.
We are super grateful, but we are also overloaded! Help us by making sure that:

  • The context for this PR is clear, with relevant discussion, decisions
    and stakeholders linked/mentioned.

  • Your contribution itself is clear (code comments, self-review for the
    rest) and in its best form. Follow the code contribution
    guidelines

    if they apply.

Getting other community members to do a review would be great help too on complex PRs (you can ask in the chats/forums). If you are unsure about something, just leave us a comment.
Next steps:

  • A maintainer will triage and assign priority to this PR, commenting on
    any missing things and potentially assigning a reviewer for high
    priority items.

  • The PR gets reviews, discussed and approvals as needed.

  • The PR is merged by maintainers when it has been approved and comments addressed.

We currently aim to provide initial feedback/triaging within two business days. Please keep an eye on any labelling actions, as these will indicate priorities and status of your contribution.
We are very grateful for your contribution!

@teghnet
Copy link

teghnet commented May 31, 2021

This is actually very useful.

Copy link
Member

@Stebalien Stebalien left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks correct. And thanks for writing the test, it makes reviewing much easier.

@Stebalien Stebalien merged commit 62df836 into ipfs:master Jun 29, 2021
@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@MDobak
Copy link
Contributor Author

MDobak commented Jun 29, 2021

Thank you :)!

@aschmahmann aschmahmann mentioned this pull request Aug 23, 2021
62 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants