Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Enable execution on GPU and ACC #1

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Enable execution on GPU and ACC #1

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

lazvlaale
Copy link

@lazvlaale lazvlaale commented Jan 23, 2019 •
edited by vladimirlaz
Loading

This PR is used to check CI settings. It will be dismissed.

vladimirlaz
vladimirlaz previously approved these changes Jan 23, 2019
View reviewed changes
@bader
Copy link
Contributor

bader commented Jan 23, 2019

Could you provide more justification in the PR description?
Is this test passing on GPU and ACC?

@vladimirlaz
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is used to check CI setting. It will be dismissed

vladimirlaz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2019
@jh7370
[llvm-symbolizer][test] Extract tests from llvm-symbolizer.test and s…
b10f112 
…implify (#1)

This is the second of a series of patches simplifying llvm-symbolizer
tests. See r352752 for the first. This one splits out 5 distinct test
cases from llvm-symbolizer.test into separate tests, and simplifies them
slightly by using --obj/positional arguments for the input file and
addresses instead of stdin.

See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40070#c1 for the motivation.

Reviewed by: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57443

llvm-svn: 352753
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2019
@legrosbuffle
[compiler-rt] Disable failing test on darwin during investigation.
ea7bd2f 
/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/test/asan/TestCases/Posix/bcmp_test.cc:14:12: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
 // CHECK: {{#1.*bcmp}}
           ^
<stdin>:2:57: note: scanning from here
==34677==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffee93777c4 at pc 0x0001068a7285 bp 0x7ffee9377770 sp 0x7ffee9376ef8
                                                        ^
<stdin>:6:20: note: possible intended match here
 #2 0x106888e77 in main bcmp_test.cc:12
                   ^

llvm-svn: 354888
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2019
@avl-llvm
Attempt to fix buildbot after r354972 [#1]. NFCI.
d89d638 
llvm-svn: 355013
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2019
@jankratochvil
Fix TestDataFormatter.test uninitialized variable
8a4efd2 
After D55626 I see a failure in my Fedora buildbot.

There is uninitialized variable as the Foo constructor has not been run and foo
is an autovariable.

(lldb) breakpoint set -f foo.cpp -l 11
Breakpoint 1: where = TestDataFormatter.test.tmp.out`main + 30 at foo.cpp:11:7, address = 0x000000000040112e
(lldb) run
Process 801065 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'TestDataFormatt', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
    frame #0: 0x000000000040112e TestDataFormatter.test.tmp.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x00007fffffffcc48) at foo.cpp:11:7
   8   	};
   9
   10  	int main(int argc, char **argv) {
-> 11  	  Foo foo(1, 2.22);
   12  	  return 0;
   13  	}

Process 801065 launched: '.../tools/lldb/lit/Reproducer/Functionalities/Output/TestDataFormatter.test.tmp.out' (x86_64)
(lldb) frame var
(int) argc = 1
(char **) argv = 0x00007fffffffcc48
(Foo) foo = (m_i = 4198432, m_d = 0)

While the testcase expects m_i will be 0.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59088

llvm-svn: 355611
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2019
@hctim
Rollback of rL355585.
92dd321 
Introduces memory leak in FunctionTest.GetPointerAlignment that breaks sanitizer buildbots:

```
=================================================================
==2453==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
    #1 0x16936bc in llvm::User::operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/User.cpp:151:19
    #2 0x7c3fe9 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:12
    #3 0x7c3fe9 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
    #4 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #5 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    #6 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #7 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #8 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #9 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #10 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    #11 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #12 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    #13 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

Indirect leak of 40 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x610428 in operator new(unsigned long) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:105
    #1 0x151be6b in make_unique<llvm::ValueSymbolTable> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:1349:29
    #2 0x151be6b in llvm::Function::Function(llvm::FunctionType*, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, unsigned int, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Module*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/IR/Function.cpp:241
    #3 0x7c4006 in Create /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Function.h:144:16
    #4 0x7c4006 in (anonymous namespace)::FunctionTest_GetPointerAlignment_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/unittests/IR/FunctionTest.cpp:136
    #5 0x1a836a0 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #6 0x1a836a0 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    #7 0x1a85c55 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #8 0x1a870d0 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #9 0x1aa5b84 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #10 0x1aa4d30 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #11 0x1aa4d30 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    #12 0x1a6b656 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #13 0x1a6b656 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    #14 0x7f5af37a22e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 168 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/11358/steps/check-llvm%20asan/logs/stdio for more information.

Also introduces use-of-uninitialized-value in ConstantsTest.FoldGlobalVariablePtr:
```
==7070==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0x14e703c in User /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5
    #1 0x14e703c in Constant /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Constant.h:44
    #2 0x14e703c in llvm::GlobalValue::GlobalValue(llvm::Type*, llvm::Value::ValueTy, llvm::Use*, unsigned int, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Twine const&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalValue.h:78
    #3 0x14e5467 in GlobalObject /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/GlobalObject.h:34:9
    #4 0x14e5467 in llvm::GlobalVariable::GlobalVariable(llvm::Type*, bool, llvm::GlobalValue::LinkageTypes, llvm::Constant*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::GlobalValue::ThreadLocalMode, unsigned int, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/Globals.cpp:314
    #5 0x6938f1 in llvm::(anonymous namespace)::ConstantsTest_FoldGlobalVariablePtr_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/unittests/IR/ConstantsTest.cpp:565:18
    #6 0x1a240a1 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #7 0x1a240a1 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474
    #8 0x1a26d26 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #9 0x1a2815f in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #10 0x1a43de8 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #11 0x1a42c47 in HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool> /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc
    #12 0x1a42c47 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257
    #13 0x1a0dfba in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #14 0x1a0dfba in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50
    #15 0x7f2081c412e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #16 0x4dff49 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/unittests/IR/IRTests+0x4dff49)

SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/include/llvm/IR/User.h:79:5 in User
```

See http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/builds/30222/steps/check-llvm%20msan/logs/stdio for more information.

llvm-svn: 355616
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2019
@yonghong-song
[BPF] handle derived type properly for computing type id
ded9a44 
Currently, the type id for a derived type is computed incorrectly.
For example,
  type #1: int
  type #2: ptr to #1

For a global variable "int *a", type #1 will be attributed to variable "a".
This is due to a bug which assigns the type id of the basetype of
that derived type as the derived type's type id. This happens
to "const", "volatile", "restrict", "typedef" and "pointer" types.

This patch fixed this bug, fixed existing test cases and added
a new one focusing on pointers plus other derived types.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 356727
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2019
@alexfh
Remove a useless assertion in clang-check.
c70d38e 
The assertion prevents it from applying fixes when used along with compilation
databases with relative paths. Added a test that demonstrates the assertion
failure.

An example of the assertion:
input.cpp:11:14: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
typedef int T
             ^
             ;
input.cpp:11:14: note: FIX-IT applied suggested code changes
clang-check: clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:94: virtual std::string (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(const std::string &, int &): Assertion `llvm::sys::path::is_absolute(filename) && "clang-fixit expects absolute paths only."' failed.
  #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:494:13
  #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18
  #2 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:357:1
  #3 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x110c0)
  #4 raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32fcf)
  #5 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x343fa)
  #6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2be37)
  #7 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2bee2)
  #8 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag)
  #9 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct_aux<char*>(char*, char*, std::__false_type)
 #10 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*)
 #11 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)
 #12 (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int&) clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:101:0
 #13 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_data() const
 #14 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_is_local() const
 #15 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_dispose()
 #16 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string()
 #17 clang::FixItRewriter::WriteFixedFiles(std::vector<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > >*) clang/lib/Frontend/Rewrite/FixItRewriter.cpp:98:0
 #18 std::__shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::get() const
 #19 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::_M_get() const
 #20 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::operator->() const
 #21 clang::CompilerInstance::getFrontendOpts() clang/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:290:0
 #22 clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:966:0
 #23 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<clang::FrontendInputFile*, std::vector<clang::FrontendInputFile, std::allocator<clang::FrontendInputFile> > >::operator++()
 #24 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:943:0
 #25 clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation(std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, clang::FileManager*, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>, clang::DiagnosticConsumer*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:369:33
 #26 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation(char const*, clang::driver::Compilation*, std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:344:18
 #27 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run() clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:329:10
 #28 clang::tooling::ClangTool::run(clang::tooling::ToolAction*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:518:11
 #29 main clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:187:15

llvm-svn: 357915
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2019
@RKSimon
Revert rL357915 from cfe/trunk: Remove a useless assertion in clang-c…
5058ca6 
…heck.

The assertion prevents it from applying fixes when used along with compilation
databases with relative paths. Added a test that demonstrates the assertion
failure.

An example of the assertion:
input.cpp:11:14: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
typedef int T
             ^
             ;
input.cpp:11:14: note: FIX-IT applied suggested code changes
clang-check: clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:94: virtual std::string (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(const std::string &, int &): Assertion `llvm::sys::path::is_absolute(filename) && "clang-fixit expects absolute paths only."' failed.
  #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:494:13
  #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18
  #2 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:357:1
  #3 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x110c0)
  #4 raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32fcf)
  #5 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x343fa)
  #6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2be37)
  #7 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2bee2)
  #8 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag)
  #9 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct_aux<char*>(char*, char*, std::__false_type)
 #10 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*)
 #11 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)
 #12 (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int&) clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:101:0
 #13 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_data() const
 #14 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_is_local() const
 #15 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_dispose()
 #16 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string()
 #17 clang::FixItRewriter::WriteFixedFiles(std::vector<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > >*) clang/lib/Frontend/Rewrite/FixItRewriter.cpp:98:0
 #18 std::__shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::get() const
 #19 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::_M_get() const
 #20 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::operator->() const
 #21 clang::CompilerInstance::getFrontendOpts() clang/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:290:0
 #22 clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:966:0
 #23 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<clang::FrontendInputFile*, std::vector<clang::FrontendInputFile, std::allocator<clang::FrontendInputFile> > >::operator++()
 #24 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:943:0
 #25 clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation(std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, clang::FileManager*, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>, clang::DiagnosticConsumer*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:369:33
 #26 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation(char const*, clang::driver::Compilation*, std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:344:18
 #27 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run() clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:329:10
 #28 clang::tooling::ClangTool::run(clang::tooling::ToolAction*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:518:11
 #29 main clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:187:15
........
Breaks windows buildbots

llvm-svn: 357918
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2019
@alexfh
Remove a useless assertion in clang-check.
fb7338b 
Re-commit r357915 with a fix for windows.

The assertion prevents it from applying fixes when used along with compilation
databases with relative paths. Added a test that demonstrates the assertion
failure.

An example of the assertion:
input.cpp:11:14: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
typedef int T
             ^
             ;
input.cpp:11:14: note: FIX-IT applied suggested code changes
clang-check: clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:94: virtual std::string (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(const std::string &, int &): Assertion `llvm::sys::path::is_absolute(filename) && "clang-fixit expects absolute paths only."' failed.
  #0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:494:13
  #1 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18
  #2 SignalHandler(int) llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:357:1
  #3 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x110c0)
  #4 raise (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32fcf)
  #5 abort (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x343fa)
  #6 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2be37)
  #7 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2bee2)
  #8 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*, std::forward_iterator_tag)
  #9 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct_aux<char*>(char*, char*, std::__false_type)
 #10 void std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>(char*, char*)
 #11 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)
 #12 (anonymous namespace)::FixItOptions::RewriteFilename(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, int&) clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:101:0
 #13 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_data() const
 #14 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_is_local() const
 #15 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_dispose()
 #16 std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string()
 #17 clang::FixItRewriter::WriteFixedFiles(std::vector<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, std::allocator<std::pair<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > >*) clang/lib/Frontend/Rewrite/FixItRewriter.cpp:98:0
 #18 std::__shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::get() const
 #19 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::_M_get() const
 #20 std::__shared_ptr_access<clang::CompilerInvocation, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2, false, false>::operator->() const
 #21 clang::CompilerInstance::getFrontendOpts() clang/include/clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h:290:0
 #22 clang::FrontendAction::EndSourceFile() clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:966:0
 #23 __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<clang::FrontendInputFile*, std::vector<clang::FrontendInputFile, std::allocator<clang::FrontendInputFile> > >::operator++()
 #24 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:943:0
 #25 clang::tooling::FrontendActionFactory::runInvocation(std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, clang::FileManager*, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>, clang::DiagnosticConsumer*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:369:33
 #26 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::runInvocation(char const*, clang::driver::Compilation*, std::shared_ptr<clang::CompilerInvocation>, std::shared_ptr<clang::PCHContainerOperations>) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:344:18
 #27 clang::tooling::ToolInvocation::run() clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:329:10
 #28 clang::tooling::ClangTool::run(clang::tooling::ToolAction*) clang/lib/Tooling/Tooling.cpp:518:11
 #29 main clang/tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp:187:15

llvm-svn: 357921
This was referenced Apr 9, 2019
Closed
Closed
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2019
@preames
[StackMaps] Add location size to llvm-readobj -stackmap output
eea989a 
The size field of a location can be different for each entry, so it is useful to have this displayed in the output of llvm-readobj -stackmap. Below is an example of how the output would look:

Record ID: 2882400000, instruction offset: 16
   3 locations:
     #1: Constant 1, size: 8
     #2: Constant 2, size: 8
     #3: Constant 3, size: 8
   0 live-outs: [ ]

Patch By: jacob.hughes@kcl.ac.uk (with heavy modification by me)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59169

llvm-svn: 358324
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2019
@zygoloid
[verify] Add support for location markers in directives.
4e8144a 
A marker (matching /#[A-Za-z0-9_-]/) is specified by attaching a comment
containing the marker to the line at which the diagnostic is expected,
and then can be referenced from an expected-* directive after an @:

  foo // #1
  // expected-error@#1 {{undeclared identifier 'foo'}}

The intent is for markers to be used in situations where relative line
numbers are currently used, to avoid the need to renumber when the test
case is rearranged.

llvm-svn: 358326
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2019
@efriedma-quic
[AArch64][MC] Reject "add x0, x1, w2, lsl #1" etc.
7238353 
Looks like just a minor oversight in the parsing code.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41504.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60840

llvm-svn: 359855
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2019
@weliveindetail
[JITLoaderGDB] Set eTypeJIT for objects read from JIT descriptors
f0ee69f 
Summary:
First part of a fix for JITed code debugging. This has been a regression from 5.0 to 6.0 and it's is still reproducible on current master: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36209

The address of the breakpoint site is corrupt: the 0x4 value we end up with, looks like an offset on a zero base address. When we parse the ELF section headers from the JIT descriptor, the load address for the text section we find in `header.sh_addr` is correct.

The bug manifests in `VMAddressProvider::GetVMRange(const ELFSectionHeader &)` (follow it from `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()`). Here we think the object type was `eTypeObjectFile` and unleash some extra logic [1] which essentially overwrites the address with a zero value.

The object type is deduced from the ELF header's `e_type` in `ObjectFileELF::CalculateType()`. It never returns `eTypeJIT`, because the ELF header has no representation for it [2]. Instead the in-memory ELF object states `ET_REL`, which leads to `eTypeObjectFile`. This is what we get from `lli` at least since 3.x. (Might it be better to write `ET_EXEC` on the JIT side instead? In fact, relocations were already applied at this point, so "Relocatable" is not quite exact.)

So, this patch proposes to set `eTypeJIT` explicitly whenever we read from a JIT descriptor. In `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()` we can then call `GetType()`, which returns the explicit value or otherwise falls back to `CalculateType()`.

LLDB then sets the breakpoint successfully. Next step: debug info.
```
Process 1056 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'lli', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2
    frame #0: 0x00007ffff7ff7000 JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp()
JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp:
->  0x7ffff7ff7000 <+0>:  pushq  %rbp
    0x7ffff7ff7001 <+1>:  movq   %rsp, %rbp
    0x7ffff7ff7004 <+4>:  movabsq $0x7ffff7ff6000, %rdi     ; imm = 0x7FFFF7FF6000
    0x7ffff7ff700e <+14>: movabsq $0x7ffff6697e80, %rcx     ; imm = 0x7FFFF6697E80
```

[1] It was first introduced with https://reviews.llvm.org/D38142#change-lF6csxV8HdlL, which has also been the original breaking change. The code has changed a lot since then.

[2] ELF object types: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/2d2277f5/llvm/include/llvm/BinaryFormat/ELF.h#L110

Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere, bkoropoff, clayborg, espindola, alexshap, stella.stamenova

Reviewed By: labath, clayborg

Subscribers: probinson, emaste, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, AlexDenisov, yurydelendik, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61611

llvm-svn: 360354
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2019
@jh7370
[llvm-objdump]Improve testing of some switches #1
2e0d0d3 
This is the first in a set of patches I have to improve testing of
llvm-objdump. This patch targets --all-headers, --section, and
--full-contents. In the --section case, it deletes a pre-canned binary
which is only used by the one test and replaces it with yaml.

Reviewed by: grimar, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61941

llvm-svn: 360893
MrSidims pushed a commit to MrSidims/llvm that referenced this pull request May 17, 2019
@efriedma-quic @MrSidims
[AArch64][MC] Reject "add x0, x1, w2, lsl intel#1" etc.
2494223 
Looks like just a minor oversight in the parsing code.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41504.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60840

llvm-svn: 359855
MrSidims pushed a commit to MrSidims/llvm that referenced this pull request May 17, 2019
@weliveindetail @MrSidims
[JITLoaderGDB] Set eTypeJIT for objects read from JIT descriptors
0086b3a 
Summary:
First part of a fix for JITed code debugging. This has been a regression from 5.0 to 6.0 and it's is still reproducible on current master: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36209

The address of the breakpoint site is corrupt: the 0x4 value we end up with, looks like an offset on a zero base address. When we parse the ELF section headers from the JIT descriptor, the load address for the text section we find in `header.sh_addr` is correct.

The bug manifests in `VMAddressProvider::GetVMRange(const ELFSectionHeader &)` (follow it from `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()`). Here we think the object type was `eTypeObjectFile` and unleash some extra logic [1] which essentially overwrites the address with a zero value.

The object type is deduced from the ELF header's `e_type` in `ObjectFileELF::CalculateType()`. It never returns `eTypeJIT`, because the ELF header has no representation for it [2]. Instead the in-memory ELF object states `ET_REL`, which leads to `eTypeObjectFile`. This is what we get from `lli` at least since 3.x. (Might it be better to write `ET_EXEC` on the JIT side instead? In fact, relocations were already applied at this point, so "Relocatable" is not quite exact.)

So, this patch proposes to set `eTypeJIT` explicitly whenever we read from a JIT descriptor. In `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()` we can then call `GetType()`, which returns the explicit value or otherwise falls back to `CalculateType()`.

LLDB then sets the breakpoint successfully. Next step: debug info.
```
Process 1056 stopped
* thread intel#1, name = 'lli', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2
    frame #0: 0x00007ffff7ff7000 JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp()
JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp:
->  0x7ffff7ff7000 <+0>:  pushq  %rbp
    0x7ffff7ff7001 <+1>:  movq   %rsp, %rbp
    0x7ffff7ff7004 <+4>:  movabsq $0x7ffff7ff6000, %rdi     ; imm = 0x7FFFF7FF6000
    0x7ffff7ff700e <+14>: movabsq $0x7ffff6697e80, %rcx     ; imm = 0x7FFFF6697E80
```

[1] It was first introduced with https://reviews.llvm.org/D38142#change-lF6csxV8HdlL, which has also been the original breaking change. The code has changed a lot since then.

[2] ELF object types: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/2d2277f5/llvm/include/llvm/BinaryFormat/ELF.h#L110

Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere, bkoropoff, clayborg, espindola, alexshap, stella.stamenova

Reviewed By: labath, clayborg

Subscribers: probinson, emaste, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, AlexDenisov, yurydelendik, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61611

llvm-svn: 360354
MrSidims pushed a commit to MrSidims/llvm that referenced this pull request May 24, 2019
@efriedma-quic @MrSidims
[AArch64][MC] Reject "add x0, x1, w2, lsl intel#1" etc.
139b7f3 
Looks like just a minor oversight in the parsing code.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41504.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60840

llvm-svn: 359855
MrSidims pushed a commit to MrSidims/llvm that referenced this pull request May 24, 2019
@weliveindetail @MrSidims
[JITLoaderGDB] Set eTypeJIT for objects read from JIT descriptors
23fa563 
Summary:
First part of a fix for JITed code debugging. This has been a regression from 5.0 to 6.0 and it's is still reproducible on current master: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36209

The address of the breakpoint site is corrupt: the 0x4 value we end up with, looks like an offset on a zero base address. When we parse the ELF section headers from the JIT descriptor, the load address for the text section we find in `header.sh_addr` is correct.

The bug manifests in `VMAddressProvider::GetVMRange(const ELFSectionHeader &)` (follow it from `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()`). Here we think the object type was `eTypeObjectFile` and unleash some extra logic [1] which essentially overwrites the address with a zero value.

The object type is deduced from the ELF header's `e_type` in `ObjectFileELF::CalculateType()`. It never returns `eTypeJIT`, because the ELF header has no representation for it [2]. Instead the in-memory ELF object states `ET_REL`, which leads to `eTypeObjectFile`. This is what we get from `lli` at least since 3.x. (Might it be better to write `ET_EXEC` on the JIT side instead? In fact, relocations were already applied at this point, so "Relocatable" is not quite exact.)

So, this patch proposes to set `eTypeJIT` explicitly whenever we read from a JIT descriptor. In `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()` we can then call `GetType()`, which returns the explicit value or otherwise falls back to `CalculateType()`.

LLDB then sets the breakpoint successfully. Next step: debug info.
```
Process 1056 stopped
* thread intel#1, name = 'lli', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2
    frame #0: 0x00007ffff7ff7000 JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp()
JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp:
->  0x7ffff7ff7000 <+0>:  pushq  %rbp
    0x7ffff7ff7001 <+1>:  movq   %rsp, %rbp
    0x7ffff7ff7004 <+4>:  movabsq $0x7ffff7ff6000, %rdi     ; imm = 0x7FFFF7FF6000
    0x7ffff7ff700e <+14>: movabsq $0x7ffff6697e80, %rcx     ; imm = 0x7FFFF6697E80
```

[1] It was first introduced with https://reviews.llvm.org/D38142#change-lF6csxV8HdlL, which has also been the original breaking change. The code has changed a lot since then.

[2] ELF object types: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/2d2277f5/llvm/include/llvm/BinaryFormat/ELF.h#L110

Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere, bkoropoff, clayborg, espindola, alexshap, stella.stamenova

Reviewed By: labath, clayborg

Subscribers: probinson, emaste, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, AlexDenisov, yurydelendik, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61611

llvm-svn: 360354
MrSidims pushed a commit to MrSidims/llvm that referenced this pull request May 24, 2019
@jh7370 @MrSidims
[llvm-objdump]Improve testing of some switches intel#1
f3a2d53 
This is the first in a set of patches I have to improve testing of
llvm-objdump. This patch targets --all-headers, --section, and
--full-contents. In the --section case, it deletes a pre-canned binary
which is only used by the one test and replaces it with yaml.

Reviewed by: grimar, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61941

llvm-svn: 360893
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2019
@jyu2-git
clang support gnu asm goto.
954ec09 
Syntax:
  asm [volatile] goto ( AssemblerTemplate
                      :
                      : InputOperands
                      : Clobbers
                      : GotoLabels)

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html

New llvm IR is "callbr" for inline asm goto instead "call" for inline asm
For:
asm goto("testl %0, %0; jne %l1;" :: "r"(cond)::label_true, loop);
IR:
callbr void asm sideeffect "testl $0, $0; jne ${1:l};", "r,X,X,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32 %0, i8* blockaddress(@foo, %label_true), i8* blockaddress(@foo, %loop)) #1
          to label %asm.fallthrough [label %label_true, label %loop], !srcloc !3

asm.fallthrough:                                

Compiler need to generate:
1> a dummy constarint 'X' for each label.
2> an unique fallthrough label for each asm goto stmt " asm.fallthrough%number".


Diagnostic 
1>	duplicate asm operand name are used in output, input and label.
2>	goto out of scope.

llvm-svn: 362045
bb-sycl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2019
[PowerPC][NFC]Remove sms-simple.ll test temporarily.
898d481 
Looks like a MachinePipeliner algorithm problem found by
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast.
I will backout this test first while investigating the problem to
unblock buildbot.

==49637==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
0x614000002e08 at pc 0x000004364350 bp 0x7ffe228a3bd0 sp 0x7ffe228a3bc8
READ of size 4 at 0x614000002e08 thread T0
    #0 0x436434f in
llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::checkValidNodeOrder(llvm::SmallVector<llvm::NodeSet,
8u> const&) const
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:3736:11
    #1 0x4342cd0 in llvm::SwingSchedulerDAG::schedule()
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:486:3
    #2 0x434042d in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::swingModuloScheduler(llvm::MachineLoop&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:385:7
    #3 0x433eb90 in
llvm::MachinePipeliner::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachinePipeliner.cpp:207:5
    #4 0x428b7ea in
llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.cpp:73:13
    #5 0x4d1a913 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1648:27
    #6 0x4d1b192 in llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1685:16
    #7 0x4d1c06d in runOnModule
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1752:27
    #8 0x4d1c06d in llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/lib/IR/LegacyPassManager.cpp:1865
    #9 0xa48ca3 in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&)
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:611:8
    #10 0xa4270f in main
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:365:22
    #11 0x7fec902572e0 in __libc_start_main
(/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #12 0x971b69 in _start
(/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_asan/bin/llc+0x971b69)

llvm-svn: 363105
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
@sdkrystian
[Clang][Sema] Explicit template arguments are not substituted into th…
77c5cea 
…e exception specification of a function (#90760)

[temp.deduct.general] p6 states:
> At certain points in the template argument deduction process it is
necessary to take a function type that makes use of template parameters
and replace those template parameters with the corresponding template
arguments.
This is done at the beginning of template argument deduction when any
explicitly specified template arguments are substituted into the
function type, and again at the end of template argument deduction when
any template arguments that were deduced or obtained from default
arguments are substituted.

[temp.deduct.general] p7 goes on to say:
> The _deduction substitution loci_ are
> - the function type outside of the _noexcept-specifier_,
> - the explicit-specifier,
> - the template parameter declarations, and
> - the template argument list of a partial specialization
>
> The substitution occurs in all types and expressions that are used in
the deduction substitution loci. [...]

Consider the following:
```cpp
struct A
{
    static constexpr bool x = true;
};

template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U) noexcept(T::x); // #1

template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::y); // #2

template<>
void f<A>(A, int*) noexcept; // clang currently accepts, GCC and EDG reject
```

Currently, `Sema::SubstituteExplicitTemplateArguments` will substitute
into the _noexcept-specifier_ when deducing template arguments from a
function declaration or when deducing template arguments for taking the
address of a function template (and the substitution is treated as a
SFINAE context). In the above example, `#1` is selected as the primary
template because substitution of the explicit template arguments into
the _noexcept-specifier_ of `#2` failed, which resulted in the candidate
being ignored.

This behavior is incorrect ([temp.deduct.general] note 4 says as much), and
this patch corrects it by deferring all substitution into the
_noexcept-specifier_ until it is instantiated.

As part of the necessary changes to make this patch work, the
instantiation of the exception specification of a function template
specialization when taking the address of a function template is changed
to only occur for the function selected by overload resolution per
[except.spec] p13.1 (as opposed to being instantiated for every candidate).
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
@sdkrystian
[Clang][Sema] Improve support for explicit specializations of constra…
34ae226 
…ined member functions & member function templates (#88963)

Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector:
```
template<typename T>
concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long);

template<typename T>
struct A 
{
    template<typename U>
    void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template 

    void g() requires C<T>; // #2, declares a function

    template<>
    void f(char);  // #3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function
};

template<>
template<typename U>
void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // #4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template

template<>
template<>
void A<int>::f(int); // #5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function

template<>
void A<long>::g(); // #6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function
```

A number of problems exist:
- Clang rejects `#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U`
substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when
`Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it
matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated
function template.
- Clang rejects `#5` because the function template specialization
instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `#5`
does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function).
- Clang rejects `#6` for the same reasons it rejects `#5`.

This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes:
- To fix `#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed
`FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_
of `#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`.
- To fix `#5` and `#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared
for explicit specializations that declare functions.

In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers
constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining
which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a
member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we
previously would select the first function that has the same type as the
explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we
match EDG's behavior for these declarations.
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2024
@stbergmann
Avoid partial munmap (#92109)
4688df6 
...which caused issues like

> ==42==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x32 (50) bytes at
address 0x117e0000 (error code: 28)
> ==42==Cannot dump memory map on emscriptenAddressSanitizer: CHECK
failed: sanitizer_common.cpp:81 "((0 && "unable to unmmap")) != (0)"
(0x0, 0x0) (tid=288045824)
> #0 0x14f73b0c in __asan::CheckUnwind()+0x14f73b0c
(this.program+0x14f73b0c)
> #1 0x14f8a3c2 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char
const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long)+0x14f8a3c2
(this.program+0x14f8a3c2)
> #2 0x14f7d6e1 in __sanitizer::ReportMunmapFailureAndDie(void*,
unsigned long, int, bool)+0x14f7d6e1 (this.program+0x14f7d6e1)
> #3 0x14f81fbd in __sanitizer::UnmapOrDie(void*, unsigned
long)+0x14f81fbd (this.program+0x14f81fbd)
> #4 0x14f875df in __sanitizer::SuppressionContext::ParseFromFile(char
const*)+0x14f875df (this.program+0x14f875df)
> #5 0x14f74eab in __asan::InitializeSuppressions()+0x14f74eab
(this.program+0x14f74eab)
> #6 0x14f73a1a in __asan::AsanInitInternal()+0x14f73a1a
(this.program+0x14f73a1a)

when trying to use an ASan suppressions file under Emscripten: Even
though it would be considered OK by SUSv4, the Emscripten runtime states
"We don't support partial munmapping" (see

<emscripten-core/emscripten@f4115eb>
"Implement MAP_ANONYMOUS on top of malloc in STANDALONE_WASM mode
(#16289)").

Co-authored-by: Stephan Bergmann <stephan.bergmann@allotropia.de>
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2024
@sdkrystian
[Clang][Sema] Do not mark template parameters in the exception specif…
667d12f 
…ication as used during partial ordering (#91534)

We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification
when determining the primary template of a function template
specialization or when taking the address of a function template.
Therefore, this patch changes `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs` such that we do
not mark template parameters in the exception specification as 'used'
during partial ordering (per [temp.deduct.partial]
p12) to prevent the following from being ambiguous:

```
template<typename T, typename U>
void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1

template<typename T>
void f(T*) noexcept; // #2

template<>
void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // currently ambiguous, selects #2 with this patch applied 
```

Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard (see core issue filed here
cplusplus/CWG#537), this seems
to be the intended behavior given the definition of _deduction
substitution loci_ in [temp.deduct.general] p7 (and EDG does the same thing).
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2024
@gribozavr
Revert "[LoopUnroll] Clamp PartialThreshold for large LoopMicroOpBuff…
83974a4 
…erSize (#67657)"

This reverts commit f0b3654.

This commit triggers UB by reading an uninitialized variable.

`UP.PartialThreshold` is used uninitialized in `getUnrollingPreferences()` when
it is called from `LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan()`. In this case the
`UP` variable is created on the stack and its fields are not initialized.

```
==8802==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0x557c0b081b99 in llvm::BasicTTIImplBase<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h
    #1 0x557c0b07a40c in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::Model<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h:2277:17
    #2 0x557c0f5d69ee in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) const llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.cpp:387:19
    #3 0x557c0e6b96a0 in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7624:7
    #4 0x557c0e6e4b63 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(llvm::Loop*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10253:13
    #5 0x557c0e6f2429 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::runImpl(llvm::Function&, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::LoopInfo&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo&, llvm::DominatorTree&, llvm::BlockFrequencyInfo*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfo*, llvm::DemandedBits&, llvm::AssumptionCache&, llvm::LoopAccessInfoManager&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter&, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10344:30
    #6 0x557c0e6f2f97 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::run(llvm::Function&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Function>&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10383:9

[...]

  Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'UP' in the stack frame
    #0 0x557c0e6b961e in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7623:3
```
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2024
@mizvekov
[clang] Implement provisional wording for CWG2398 regarding packs (#9…
c86a53d 
…0820)

This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how
template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce
the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args`
by default.

When performing template argument deduction, a template template
parameter
containing no packs should be more specialized than one that does.

Given the following example:
```C++
template<class T2> struct A;
template<template<class ...T3s> class TT1, class T4> struct A<TT1<T4>>; // #1
template<template<class    T5 > class TT2, class T6> struct A<TT2<T6>>; // #2

template<class T1> struct B;
template struct A<B<char>>;
```

Prior to P0522, candidate `#2` would be more specialized.
After P0522, neither is more specialized, so this becomes ambiguous.
With this change, `#2` becomes more specialized again,
maintaining compatibility with pre-P0522 implementations.

The problem is that in P0522, candidates are at least as specialized
when matching packs to fixed-size lists both ways, whereas before,
a fixed-size list is more specialized.

This patch keeps the original behavior when checking template arguments
outside deduction, but restores this aspect of pre-P0522 matching
during deduction.

---

Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has
not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry,
we don't provide a changelog entry here.
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
@mizvekov
[clang] Implement CWG2398 provisional TTP matching to class templates…
ff3f41d 
… (#92855)

This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template
template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the
negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by
default.

When performing template argument deduction, we extend the provisional
wording introduced in llvm/llvm-project#89807 so
it also covers deduction of class templates.

Given the following example:
```C++
template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A;
template <class T3> struct B;

template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>;   // #1
template <class T6, class T7>                      struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2

template struct B<A<int>>;
```
Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This
patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again.

This has the beneficial side effect of making the following code valid:
```C++
template<class T, class U> struct A {};
A<int, float> v;
template<template<class> class TT> void f(TT<int>);

// OK: TT picks 'float' as the default argument for the second parameter.
void g() { f(v); }
```

---

Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not
been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't
provide a changelog entry here.
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2024
@whentojump @chapuni
[Coverage][Expansion] handle nested macros in scratch space (#89869)
f9e9e59 
The problematic program is as follows:

```shell
#define pre_a 0
#define PRE(x) pre_##x

void f(void) {
    PRE(a) && 0;
}

int main(void) { return 0; }
```

in which after token concatenation (`##`), there's another nested macro
`pre_a`.

Currently only the outer expansion region will be produced. ([compiler
explorer
link](https://godbolt.org/#g:!((g:!((g:!((h:codeEditor,i:(filename:'1',fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:1,lang:___c,selection:(endColumn:29,endLineNumber:8,positionColumn:29,positionLineNumber:8,selectionStartColumn:29,selectionStartLineNumber:8,startColumn:29,startLineNumber:8),source:'%23define+pre_a+0%0A%23define+PRE(x)+pre_%23%23x%0A%0Avoid+f(void)+%7B%0A++++PRE(a)+%26%26+0%3B%0A%7D%0A%0Aint+main(void)+%7B+return+0%3B+%7D'),l:'5',n:'0',o:'C+source+%231',t:'0')),k:51.69491525423727,l:'4',n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0'),(g:!((g:!((h:compiler,i:(compiler:cclang_assertions_trunk,filters:(b:'0',binary:'1',binaryObject:'1',commentOnly:'0',debugCalls:'1',demangle:'0',directives:'0',execute:'0',intel:'0',libraryCode:'1',trim:'1',verboseDemangling:'0'),flagsViewOpen:'1',fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:2,lang:___c,libs:!(),options:'-fprofile-instr-generate+-fcoverage-mapping+-fcoverage-mcdc+-Xclang+-dump-coverage-mapping+',overrides:!(),selection:(endColumn:1,endLineNumber:1,positionColumn:1,positionLineNumber:1,selectionStartColumn:1,selectionStartLineNumber:1,startColumn:1,startLineNumber:1),source:1),l:'5',n:'0',o:'+x86-64+clang+(assertions+trunk)+(Editor+%231)',t:'0')),k:34.5741843594503,l:'4',m:28.903654485049834,n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0'),(g:!((h:output,i:(compilerName:'x86-64+clang+(trunk)',editorid:1,fontScale:14,fontUsePx:'0',j:2,wrap:'1'),l:'5',n:'0',o:'Output+of+x86-64+clang+(assertions+trunk)+(Compiler+%232)',t:'0')),header:(),l:'4',m:71.09634551495017,n:'0',o:'',s:0,t:'0')),k:48.30508474576271,l:'3',n:'0',o:'',t:'0')),l:'2',m:100,n:'0',o:'',t:'0')),version:4))

```text
f:
  File 0, 4:14 -> 6:2 = #0
  Decision,File 0, 5:5 -> 5:16 = M:0, C:2
  Expansion,File 0, 5:5 -> 5:8 = #0 (Expanded file = 1)
  File 0, 5:15 -> 5:16 = #1
  Branch,File 0, 5:15 -> 5:16 = 0, 0 [2,0,0] 
  File 1, 2:16 -> 2:23 = #0
  File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = #0
  File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = #0
  Branch,File 2, 1:15 -> 1:16 = 0, 0 [1,2,0] 
```

The inner expansion region isn't produced because:

1. In the range-based for loop quoted below, each sloc is processed and
possibly emit a corresponding expansion region.
2. For our sloc in question, its direct parent returned by
`getIncludeOrExpansionLoc()` is a `<scratch space>`, because that's how
`##` is processed.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/88b6186af3908c55b357858eb348b5143f21c289/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp#L518-L520

3. This `<scratch space>` cannot be found in the FileID mapping so
`ParentFileID` will be assigned an `std::nullopt`


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/88b6186af3908c55b357858eb348b5143f21c289/clang/lib/CodeGen/CoverageMappingGen.cpp#L521-L526

4. As a result this iteration of for loop finishes early and no
expansion region is added for the sloc.

This problem gets worse with MC/DC: as the example shows, there's a
branch from File 2 but File 2 itself is missing. This will trigger
assertion failures.

The fix is more or less a workaround and takes a similar approach as
#89573.

~~Depends on #89573.~~ This includes #89573. Kudos to @chapuni!
This and #89573 together fix #87000: I tested locally, both the reduced
program and my original use case (fwiw, Linux kernel) can run
successfully.

---------

Co-authored-by: NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic@gmail.com>
steffenlarsen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
@uditagarwal97
[SYCL] Add UUID and sub-, sub-sub- device info in sycl-ls --verbose (…
82ebc23 
…#13999)

Example `sycl-ls --verbose` output:

```
...
Platform [#1]:
    Version  : 1.3
    Name     : Intel(R) Level-Zero
    Vendor   : Intel(R) Corporation
    Devices  : 1
        Type              : gpu
        Version           : 12.60.7
        Name              : Intel(R) Data Center GPU Max 1550
        Vendor            : Intel(R) Corporation
        Driver            : 1.3.26918
        UUID              : 1341282141147000580000000
        Num SubDevices    : 2
        Num SubSubDevices : 8
        Aspects           : gpu fp16 fp64 ...
```
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2024
@davemgreen
[LSR][AArch64] Optimize chain generation based on legal addressing mo…
c7308d4 
…des (#94453)

LSR will generate chains of related instructions with a known increment
between them. With SVE, in the case of the test case, this can include
increments like 'vscale * 16 + 8'. The idea of this patch is if we have
a '+8' increment already calculated in the chain, we can generate a
(legal) '+ vscale*16' addressing mode from it, allowing us to use the
'[x16, #1, mul vl]' addressing mode instructions.

In order to do this we keep track of the known 'bases' when generating
chains in GenerateIVChain, checking for each if the accumulated
increment expression from the base neatly folds into a legal addressing
mode. If they do not we fall back to the existing LeftOverExpr, whether
it is legal or not.

This is mostly orthogonal to #88124, dealing with the generation of
chains as opposed to rest of LSR. The existing vscale addressing mode
work has greatly helped compared to the last time I looked at this,
allowing us to check that the addressing modes are indeed legal.
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2024
@spaits
[Sema][CTAD] Allow user defined conversion for copy-list-initializati…
f80bd9b 
…on (#94752)

Fixes #62925.

The following code:
```cpp
#include <map>

int main() {
   std::map m1 = {std::pair{"foo", 2}, {"bar", 3}}; // guide #2
   std::map m2(m1.begin(), m1.end()); // guide #1
}
```
Is rejected by clang, but accepted by both gcc and msvc:
https://godbolt.org/z/6v4fvabb5 .

So basically CTAD with copy-list-initialization is rejected.

Note that this exact code is also used in a cppreference article:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/map/deduction_guides

I checked the C++11 and C++20 standard drafts to see whether suppressing
user conversion is the correct thing to do for user conversions. Based
on the standard I don't think that it is correct.

```
13.3.1.4 Copy-initialization of class by user-defined conversion [over.match.copy]
Under the conditions specified in 8.5, as part of a copy-initialization of an object of class type, a user-defined
conversion can be invoked to convert an initializer expression to the type of the object being initialized.
Overload resolution is used to select the user-defined conversion to be invoked
```
So we could use user defined conversions according to the standard.

```
If a narrowing conversion is required to initialize any of the elements, the
program is ill-formed.
```
We should not do narrowing.

```
In copy-list-initialization, if an explicit constructor is chosen, the initialization is ill-formed.
```
We should not use explicit constructors.
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
@aheejin
[WebAssembly] Treat 'rethrow' as terminator in custom isel (#95967)
3c8f3b9 
`rethrow` instruction is a terminator, but when when its DAG is built in
`SelectionDAGBuilder` in a custom routine, it was NOT treated as such.

```ll
rethrow:                                          ; preds = %catch.start
  invoke void @llvm.wasm.rethrow() #1 [ "funclet"(token %1) ]
          to label %unreachable unwind label %ehcleanup

ehcleanup:                                        ; preds = %rethrow, %catch.dispatch
  %tmp = phi i32 [ 10, %catch.dispatch ], [ 20, %rethrow ]
  ...
```

In this bitcode, because of the `phi`, a `CONST_I32` will be created in
the `rethrow` BB. Without this patch, the DAG for the `rethrow` BB looks
like this:
```
  t0: ch,glue = EntryToken
      t3: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %9, Constant:i32<20>
      t5: ch = llvm.wasm.rethrow t0, TargetConstant:i32<12161>
    t6: ch = TokenFactor t3, t5
  t8: ch = br t6, BasicBlock:ch<unreachable 0x562532e43c50>
```
Note that `CopyToReg` and `llvm.wasm.rethrow` don't have dependence so
either can come first in the selected code, which can result in the code
like
```mir
bb.3.rethrow:
  RETHROW 0, implicit-def dead $arguments
  %9:i32 = CONST_I32 20, implicit-def dead $arguments
  BR %bb.6, implicit-def dead $arguments
```

After this patch, `llvm.wasm.rethrow` is treated as a terminator, and
the DAG will look like
```
        t0: ch,glue = EntryToken
      t3: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %9, Constant:i32<20>
    t5: ch = llvm.wasm.rethrow t3, TargetConstant:i32<12161>
  t7: ch = br t5, BasicBlock:ch<unreachable 0x5555e3d32c70>
```
Note that now `rethrow` takes a token from `CopyToReg`, so `rethrow` has
to come after `CopyToReg`. And the resulting code will be
```mir
bb.3.rethrow:
  %9:i32 = CONST_I32 20, implicit-def dead $arguments
  RETHROW 0, implicit-def dead $arguments
  BR %bb.6, implicit-def dead $arguments
```

I'm not very familiar with the internals of `getRoot` vs.
`getControlRoot`, but other terminator instructions seem to use the
latter, and using it for `rethrow` too worked.
@jsji jsji mentioned this pull request Jul 3, 2024
Closed
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2024
@pifon2a
Revert "[mlir][loops] Reland Refactor LoopFuseSiblingOp and support p…
97a2bd8 
…arallel fusion #94391 (#97607)"

This reverts commit edbc0e3.

Reason for rollback. ASAN complains about this PR:

==4320==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x502000006cd8 at pc 0x55e2978d63cf bp 0x7ffe6431c2b0 sp 0x7ffe6431c2a8
READ of size 8 at 0x502000006cd8 thread T0
    #0 0x55e2978d63ce in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr> mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11
    #1 0x55e2978d63ce in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:156:11
    #2 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43
    #3 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17
    #4 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56
    #5 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14
    #6 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48
    #7 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15
    #8 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10
    #9 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56
    #10 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14
    #11 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48
    #12 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16
    #13 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10
    #14 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16
    #15 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17
    #16 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    #17 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    #18 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7
    #19 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21
    #20 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16
    #21 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10
    #22 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60
    #23 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17
    #24 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9
    #25 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12
    #26 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    #27 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    #28 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16
    #29 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3
    #30 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3
    #31 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3
    #32 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10
    #33 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14
    #34 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10
    #35 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33
    #36 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94)
    #37 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120

0x502000006cd8 is located 8 bytes inside of 16-byte region [0x502000006cd0,0x502000006ce0)
freed by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x55e29130b7e2 in operator delete(void*, unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:155:3
    #1 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_operator_delete<void *, unsigned long>
    #2 0x55e2979eb657 in __do_deallocate_handle_size<>
    #3 0x55e2979eb657 in __libcpp_deallocate
    #4 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate
    #5 0x55e2979eb657 in deallocate
    #6 0x55e2979eb657 in operator()
    #7 0x55e2979eb657 in ~vector
    #8 0x55e2979eb657 in mlir::Block::~Block() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:24:1
    #9 0x55e2979ebc17 in deleteNode llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:42:39
    #10 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:205:5
    #11 0x55e2979ebc17 in erase llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:209:39
    #12 0x55e2979ebc17 in mlir::Block::erase() mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:67:28
    #13 0x55e297aef978 in mlir::RewriterBase::eraseBlock(mlir::Block*) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:245:10
    #14 0x55e297af0563 in mlir::RewriterBase::inlineBlockBefore(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::ilist_detail::node_options<mlir::Operation, false, false, void, false, void>, false, false>, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:331:3
    #15 0x55e297af06d8 in mlir::RewriterBase::mergeBlocks(mlir::Block*, mlir::Block*, mlir::ValueRange) mlir/lib/IR/PatternMatch.cpp:341:3
    #16 0x55e297036608 in mlir::scf::ForOp::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:575:12
    #17 0x55e2970673ca in mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::scf::ForOp>::replaceWithAdditionalYields(mlir::detail::LoopLikeOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::ValueRange, bool, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)> const&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.h.inc:658:56
    #18 0x55e2978d5feb in replaceWithAdditionalYields blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp.inc:105:14
    #19 0x55e2978d5feb in mlir::createFused(mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::RewriterBase&, std::__u::function<llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value, 6u> (mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>)>, llvm::function_ref<void (mlir::RewriterBase&, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface, mlir::LoopLikeOpInterface&, mlir::IRMapping)>) mlir/lib/Interfaces/LoopLikeInterface.cpp:135:14
    #20 0x55e2952a614b in mlir::fuseIndependentSiblingForLoops(mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::scf::ForOp, mlir::RewriterBase&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/Utils/Utils.cpp:1398:43
    #21 0x55e291480c6f in mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/TransformOps/SCFTransformOps.cpp:482:17
    #22 0x55e29149ed5e in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::LoopFuseSiblingOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56
    #23 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14
    #24 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48
    #25 0x55e294646a8d in applySequenceBlock(mlir::Block&, mlir::transform::FailurePropagationMode, mlir::transform::TransformState&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:1788:15
    #26 0x55e29464f927 in mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp::apply(mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/IR/TransformOps.cpp:2155:10
    #27 0x55e2945d28ee in mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Model<mlir::transform::NamedSequenceOp>::apply(mlir::transform::detail::TransformOpInterfaceInterfaceTraits::Concept const*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformRewriter&, mlir::transform::TransformResults&, mlir::transform::TransformState&) blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.h.inc:477:56
    #28 0x55e297494a60 in apply blaze-out/k8-opt-asan/bin/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp.inc:61:14
    #29 0x55e297494a60 in mlir::transform::TransformState::applyTransform(mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:953:48
    #30 0x55e2974a5fe2 in mlir::transform::applyTransforms(mlir::Operation*, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>> const&, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&, bool) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Interfaces/TransformInterfaces.cpp:2016:16
    #31 0x55e2945888d7 in mlir::transform::applyTransformNamedSequence(mlir::RaggedArray<llvm::PointerUnion<mlir::Operation*, mlir::Attribute, mlir::Value>>, mlir::transform::TransformOpInterface, mlir::ModuleOp, mlir::transform::TransformOptions const&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/TransformInterpreterUtils.cpp:234:10
    #32 0x55e294582446 in (anonymous namespace)::InterpreterPass::runOnOperation() mlir/lib/Dialect/Transform/Transforms/InterpreterPass.cpp:147:16
    #33 0x55e2978e93c6 in operator() mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:527:17
    #34 0x55e2978e93c6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int)::$_1>(long) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    #35 0x55e2978e207a in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    #36 0x55e2978e207a in executeAction<mlir::PassExecutionAction, mlir::Pass &> mlir/include/mlir/IR/MLIRContext.h:275:7
    #37 0x55e2978e207a in mlir::detail::OpToOpPassAdaptor::run(mlir::Pass*, mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager, bool, unsigned int) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:521:21
    #38 0x55e2978e5fbf in runPipeline mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:593:16
    #39 0x55e2978e5fbf in mlir::PassManager::runPasses(mlir::Operation*, mlir::AnalysisManager) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:904:10
    #40 0x55e2978e5b65 in mlir::PassManager::run(mlir::Operation*) mlir/lib/Pass/Pass.cpp:884:60
    #41 0x55e291ebb460 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:408:17
    #42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9
    #43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12
    #44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    #45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    #46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16
    #47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3
    #48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3
    #49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3
    #50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10
    #51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14

previously allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x55e29130ab5d in operator new(unsigned long) compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:86:3
    #1 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_operator_new<unsigned long>
    #2 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __libcpp_allocate
    #3 0x55e2979ed5d4 in allocate
    #4 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __allocate_at_least<std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >
    #5 0x55e2979ed5d4 in __split_buffer
    #6 0x55e2979ed5d4 in mlir::BlockArgument* std::__u::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::__u::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>>::__push_back_slow_path<mlir::BlockArgument const&>(mlir::BlockArgument const&)
    #7 0x55e2979ec0f2 in push_back
    #8 0x55e2979ec0f2 in mlir::Block::addArgument(mlir::Type, mlir::Location) mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:154:13
    #9 0x55e29796e457 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2172:34
    #10 0x55e29796e457 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7
    #11 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16
    #12 0x55e297035742 in mlir::scf::ForOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/SCF/IR/SCF.cpp:521:14
    #13 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12
    #14 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12
    #15 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    #16 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    #17 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9
    #18 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19
    #19 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10
    #20 0x55e297971d20 in parseBlockBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2296:9
    #21 0x55e297971d20 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseBlock(mlir::Block*&) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2226:12
    #22 0x55e29796e4f5 in parseRegionBody mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2184:7
    #23 0x55e29796e4f5 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2121:7
    #24 0x55e29796b25e in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1785:16
    #25 0x55e29796b2cf in (anonymous namespace)::CustomOpAsmParser::parseOptionalRegion(mlir::Region&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::OpAsmParser::Argument>, bool) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1796:12
    #26 0x55e2978d89ff in mlir::function_interface_impl::parseFunctionOp(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&, bool, mlir::StringAttr, llvm::function_ref<mlir::Type (mlir::Builder&, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Type>, mlir::function_interface_impl::VariadicFlag, std::__u::basic_string<char, std::__u::char_traits<char>, std::__u::allocator<char>>&)>, mlir::StringAttr, mlir::StringAttr) mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionImplementation.cpp:232:14
    #27 0x55e2969ba41d in mlir::func::FuncOp::parse(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) mlir/lib/Dialect/Func/IR/FuncOps.cpp:203:10
    #28 0x55e291322c18 in llvm::ParseResult llvm::detail::UniqueFunctionBase<llvm::ParseResult, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&>::CallImpl<llvm::ParseResult (*)(mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&)>(void*, mlir::OpAsmParser&, mlir::OperationState&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:220:12
    #29 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/FunctionExtras.h:384:12
    #30 0x55e29795bea3 in callback_fn<llvm::unique_function<llvm::ParseResult (mlir::OpAsmParser &, mlir::OperationState &)> > llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    #31 0x55e29795bea3 in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    #32 0x55e29795bea3 in parseOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1521:9
    #33 0x55e29795bea3 in parseCustomOperation mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2017:19
    #34 0x55e29795bea3 in (anonymous namespace)::OperationParser::parseOperation() mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:1174:10
    #35 0x55e297959b78 in parse mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2725:20
    #36 0x55e297959b78 in mlir::parseAsmSourceFile(llvm::SourceMgr const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::AsmParserState*, mlir::AsmParserCodeCompleteContext*) mlir/lib/AsmParser/Parser.cpp:2785:41
    #37 0x55e29790d5c2 in mlir::parseSourceFile(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::Block*, mlir::ParserConfig const&, mlir::LocationAttr*) mlir/lib/Parser/Parser.cpp:46:10
    #38 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp, const std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> &> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:159:14
    #39 0x55e291ebbfe2 in parseSourceFile<mlir::ModuleOp> mlir/include/mlir/Parser/Parser.h:189:10
    #40 0x55e291ebbfe2 in mlir::parseSourceFileForTool(std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::ParserConfig const&, bool) mlir/include/mlir/Tools/ParseUtilities.h:31:12
    #41 0x55e291ebb263 in performActions(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::shared_ptr<llvm::SourceMgr> const&, mlir::MLIRContext*, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:383:33
    #42 0x55e291ebabd9 in processBuffer mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:481:9
    #43 0x55e291ebabd9 in operator() mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:548:12
    #44 0x55e291ebabd9 in llvm::LogicalResult llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>::callback_fn<mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&)::$_0>(long, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:45:12
    #45 0x55e297b1cffe in operator() llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:68:12
    #46 0x55e297b1cffe in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef)::$_0::operator()(llvm::StringRef) const mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:86:16
    #47 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<const llvm::StringRef *, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), (lambda at llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:49), void> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2125:3
    #48 0x55e297b1c9c5 in interleave<llvm::SmallVector<llvm::StringRef, 8U>, (lambda at mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:79:23), llvm::raw_ostream, llvm::StringRef> llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:2147:3
    #49 0x55e297b1c9c5 in mlir::splitAndProcessBuffer(std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::function_ref<llvm::LogicalResult (std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, llvm::raw_ostream&)>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef) mlir/lib/Support/ToolUtilities.cpp:89:3
    #50 0x55e291eb0cf0 in mlir::MlirOptMain(llvm::raw_ostream&, std::__u::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, std::__u::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer>>, mlir::DialectRegistry&, mlir::MlirOptMainConfig const&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:551:10
    #51 0x55e291eb115c in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:589:14
    #52 0x55e291eb15f8 in mlir::MlirOptMain(int, char**, llvm::StringRef, mlir::DialectRegistry&) mlir/lib/Tools/mlir-opt/MlirOptMain.cpp:605:10
    #53 0x55e29130d1be in main mlir/tools/mlir-opt/mlir-opt.cpp:311:33
    #54 0x7fbcf3fff3d3 in __libc_start_main (/usr/grte/v5/lib64/libc.so.6+0x613d3) (BuildId: 9a996398ce14a94560b0c642eb4f6e94)
    #55 0x55e2912365a9 in _start /usr/grte/v5/debug-src/src/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free mlir/include/mlir/IR/IRMapping.h:40:11 in map<llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument> &, llvm::MutableArrayRef<mlir::BlockArgument>, nullptr>
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x502000006a00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006a80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00
  0x502000006b00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006b80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00
  0x502000006c00: fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 00 fa fa fd fa
=>0x502000006c80: fa fa fd fa fa fa fd fd fa fa fd[fd]fa fa fd fd
  0x502000006d00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006d80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006e00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006e80: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 00 fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
  0x502000006f00: fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa fa fa 00 fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:           00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  Intra object redzone:    bb
  ASan internal:           fe
  Left alloca redzone:     ca
  Right alloca redzone:    cb
==4320==ABORTING
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
@kendalharland
Fix flake in TestZerothFrame.py (#96685)
4c23625 
This test is currently flaky on a local Windows amd64 build. The reason
is that it relies on the order of `process.threads` but this order is
nondeterministic:

If we print lldb's inputs and outputs while running, we can see that the
breakpoints are always being set correctly, and always being hit:

```sh
runCmd: breakpoint set -f "main.c" -l 2
output: Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`func_inner + 1 at main.c:2:9, address = 0x0000000140001001

runCmd: breakpoint set -f "main.c" -l 7
output: Breakpoint 2: where = a.out`main + 17 at main.c:7:5, address = 0x0000000140001021

runCmd: run
output: Process 52328 launched: 'C:\workspace\llvm-project\llvm\build\lldb-test-build.noindex\functionalities\unwind\zeroth_frame\TestZerothFrame.test_dwarf\a.out' (x86_64)
Process 52328 stopped
* thread #1, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
    frame #0: 0x00007ff68f6b1001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9
   1    void func_inner() {
-> 2        int a = 1;  // Set breakpoint 1 here
                ^
   3    }
   4
   5    int main() {
   6        func_inner();
   7        return 0; // Set breakpoint 2 here
```

However, sometimes the backtrace printed in this test shows that the
process is stopped inside NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory from
`ntdll.dll`:

```sh
Backtrace at the first breakpoint:
frame #0: 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
frame #1: 0x00007ffecc74585e ntdll.dll`RtlClearThreadWorkOnBehalfTicket + 862
frame #2: 0x00007ffecc3e257d kernel32.dll`BaseThreadInitThunk + 29
frame #3: 0x00007ffecc76af28 ntdll.dll`RtlUserThreadStart + 40
```

When this happens, the test fails with an assertion error that the
stopped thread's zeroth frame's current line number does not match the
expected line number. This is because the test is looking at the wrong
thread: `process.threads[0]`.

If we print the list of threads each time the test is run, we notice
that threads are sometimes in a different order, within
`process.threads`:

```sh
Thread 0: thread #4: tid = 0x9c38, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
Thread 1: thread #2: tid = 0xa950, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
Thread 2: thread #1: tid = 0xab18, 0x00007ff64bc81001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
Thread 3: thread #3: tid = 0xc514, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20

Thread 0: thread #3: tid = 0x018c, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
Thread 1: thread #1: tid = 0x85c8, 0x00007ff7130c1001 a.out`func_inner at main.c:2:9, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
Thread 2: thread #2: tid = 0xf344, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
Thread 3: thread #4: tid = 0x6a50, 0x00007ffecc7b3bf4 ntdll.dll`NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory + 20
```

Use `self.thread()` to consistently select the correct thread, instead.

Co-authored-by: kendal <kendal@thebrowser.company>
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
@sdkrystian
[Clang][Index] Add support for dependent class scope explicit special…
d528537 
…izations of function templates to USRGenerator (#98027)

Given the following:
```
template<typename T>
struct A
{
    void f(int); // #1
    
    template<typename U>
    void f(U); // #2
    
    template<>
    void f<int>(int); // #3
};
```
Clang will generate the same USR for `#1` and `#2`. This patch fixes the
issue by including the template arguments of dependent class scope
explicit specializations in their USRs.
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
@Michael137
[lldb] Add frame recognizer for __builtin_verbose_trap (#80368)
8a27ef6 
This patch adds a frame recognizer for Clang's
`__builtin_verbose_trap`, which behaves like a
`__builtin_trap`, but emits a failure-reason string into debug-info in
order for debuggers to display
it to a user.

The frame recognizer triggers when we encounter
a frame with a function name that begins with
`__clang_trap_msg`, which is the magic prefix
Clang emits into debug-info for verbose traps.
Once such frame is encountered we display the
frame function name as the `Stop Reason` and display that frame to the
user.

Example output:
```
(lldb) run
warning: a.out was compiled with optimization - stepping may behave oddly; variables may not be available.
Process 35942 launched: 'a.out' (arm64)
Process 35942 stopped
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented
    frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt]
   1    struct Dummy {
   2      void func() {
-> 3        __builtin_verbose_trap("Misc.", "Function is not implemented");
   4      }
   5    };
   6
   7    int main() {
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Misc.: Function is not implemented
    frame #0: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] __clang_trap_msg$Misc.$Function is not implemented$ at verbose_trap.cpp:0 [opt]
  * frame #1: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main [inlined] Dummy::func(this=<unavailable>) at verbose_trap.cpp:3:5 [opt]
    frame #2: 0x0000000100003fa4 a.out`main at verbose_trap.cpp:8:13 [opt]
    frame #3: 0x0000000189d518b4 dyld`start + 1988
```
@bader bader mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Open
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2024
@chestnykh
[compiler-rt] Implement DumpAllRegisters for arm-linux and aarch64-…
ef1c70d 
…linux (#99613)

Examples of the output:

ARM:
```
# ./a.out 
AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
=================================================================
==122==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0000007a (pc 0x76e13ac0 bp 0x7eb7fd00 sp 0x7eb7fcc8 T0)
==122==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
==122==Hint: address points to the zero page.
    #0 0x76e13ac0  (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0)
    #1 0x76dce680 in gsignal (/lib/libc.so.6+0x37680)
    #2 0x005c2250  (/root/a.out+0x145250)
    #3 0x76db982c  (/lib/libc.so.6+0x2282c)
    #4 0x76db9918 in __libc_start_main (/lib/libc.so.6+0x22918)

==122==Register values:
 r0 = 0x00000000   r1 = 0x0000007a   r2 = 0x0000000b   r3 = 0x76d95020  
 r4 = 0x0000007a   r5 = 0x00000001   r6 = 0x005dcc5c   r7 = 0x0000010c  
 r8 = 0x0000000b   r9 = 0x76f9ece0  r10 = 0x00000000  r11 = 0x7eb7fd00  
r12 = 0x76dce670   sp = 0x7eb7fcc8   lr = 0x76e13ab4   pc = 0x76e13ac0  
AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/lib/libc.so.6+0x7cac0) 
==122==ABORTING
```

AArch64:
```
# ./a.out 
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
==99==ERROR: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000063 (pc 0x007fbbbc5860 bp 0x007fcfdcb700 sp 0x007fcfdcb700 T99)
==99==The signal is caused by a UNKNOWN memory access.
==99==Hint: address points to the zero page.
    #0 0x007fbbbc5860  (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860)
    #1 0x007fbbb81578  (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3e578)
    #2 0x00556051152c  (/root/a.out+0x3152c)
    #3 0x007fbbb6e268  (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b268)
    #4 0x007fbbb6e344  (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2b344)
    #5 0x0055604e45ec  (/root/a.out+0x45ec)

==99==Register values:
 x0 = 0x0000000000000000   x1 = 0x0000000000000063   x2 = 0x000000000000000b   x3 = 0x0000007fbbb41440  
 x4 = 0x0000007fbbb41580   x5 = 0x3669288942d44cce   x6 = 0x0000000000000000   x7 = 0x00000055605110b0  
 x8 = 0x0000000000000083   x9 = 0x0000000000000000  x10 = 0x0000000000000000  x11 = 0x0000000000000000  
x12 = 0x0000007fbbdb3360  x13 = 0x0000000000010000  x14 = 0x0000000000000039  x15 = 0x00000000004113a0  
x16 = 0x0000007fbbb81560  x17 = 0x0000005560540138  x18 = 0x000000006474e552  x19 = 0x0000000000000063  
x20 = 0x0000000000000001  x21 = 0x000000000000000b  x22 = 0x0000005560511510  x23 = 0x0000007fcfdcb918  
x24 = 0x0000007fbbdb1b50  x25 = 0x0000000000000000  x26 = 0x0000007fbbdb2000  x27 = 0x000000556053f858  
x28 = 0x0000000000000000   fp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700   lr = 0x0000007fbbbc584c   sp = 0x0000007fcfdcb700  
UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: SEGV (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x82860) 
==99==ABORTING
```
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2024
@rorth
[sanitizer_common] Fix UnwindFast on SPARC (#101634)
3368a32 
```
  UBSan-Standalone-sparc :: TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp
```
`FAIL`s on 32 and 64-bit Linux/sparc64 (and on Solaris/sparcv9, too: the
test isn't Linux-specific at all). With
`UBSAN_OPTIONS=fast_unwind_on_fatal=1`, the stack trace shows a
duplicate innermost frame:
```
compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:31: runtime error: execution reached the end of a value-returning function without returning a value
    #0 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35
    #1 0x7003a708 in f() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:14:35
    #2 0x7003a714 in g() compiler-rt/test/ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux/diag-stacktrace.cpp:17:38
```
which isn't seen with `fast_unwind_on_fatal=0`.

This turns out to be another fallout from fixing
`__builtin_return_address`/`__builtin_extract_return_addr` on SPARC. In
`sanitizer_stacktrace_sparc.cpp` (`BufferedStackTrace::UnwindFast`) the
`pc` arg is the return address, while `pc1` from the stack frame
(`fr_savpc`) is the address of the `call` insn, leading to a double
entry for the innermost frame in `trace_buffer[]`.

This patch fixes this by moving the adjustment before all uses.

Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu` and `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`
(with the `ubsan/TestCases/Misc/Linux` tests enabled).
@aarongreig aarongreig mentioned this pull request Aug 16, 2024
Open
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2024
@nicovank
[clang][ASTMatcher] Fix execution order of hasOperands submatchers (#…
f9e2a86 
…104148)

`hasOperands` does not always execute matchers in the order they are
written. This can cause issue in code using bindings when one operand
matcher is relying on a binding set by the other. With this change, the
first matcher present in the code is always executed first and any
binding it sets are available to the second matcher.

Simple example with current version (1 match) and new version (2
matches):
```bash
> cat tmp.cpp
int a = 13;
int b = ((int) a) - a;
int c = a - ((int) a);

> clang-query tmp.cpp
clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource
clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d"))))))

Match #1:

tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here
int a = 13;
^~~~~~~~~~
tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here
int b = ((int)a) - a;
        ^~~~~~~~~~~~
1 match.

> ./build/bin/clang-query tmp.cpp
clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource
clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d"))))))

Match #1:

tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here
    1 | int a = 13;
      | ^~~~~~~~~~
tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here
    2 | int b = ((int)a) - a;
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~

Match #2:

tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here
    1 | int a = 13;
      | ^~~~~~~~~~
tmp.cpp:3:9: note: "root" binds here
    3 | int c = a - ((int)a);
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
2 matches.
```

If this should be documented or regression tested anywhere please let me
know where.
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2024
@adrian-prantl
[lldb] Extend frame recognizers to hide frames from backtraces (#104523)
f01f80c 
Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are
fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the
compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible
mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and
automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and
`down`.

This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still
provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a
hint that frames have been hidden.

My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift
programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for
`std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while
debugging LLDB.

rdar://126629381


Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even
more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without
the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's
really only meant as an example).

before:
```
(lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10
    frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25
    frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12
    frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12
    frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10
    frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12
    frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10
    frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10
    frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476
(lldb) 
```

after

```
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10
    frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25
    frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12
    frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10
    frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10
    frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476
Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers
```
@MajidAbdelilah MajidAbdelilah mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024
Open
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
@ezhulenev
[orc] Fix asan error in RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp (#106300)
c0ebc18 
`JITDylibSearchOrderResolver` local variable can be destroyed before
completion of all callbacks. Capture it together with `Deps` in
`OnEmitted` callback.

Original error:

```
==2035==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7bebfa155b70 at pc 0x7ff2a9a88b4a bp 0x7bec08d51980 sp 0x7bec08d51978
READ of size 8 at 0x7bebfa155b70 thread T87 (tf_xla-cpu-llvm)
    #0 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:58
    #1 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __invoke<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:149:25
    #2 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __call<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:224:5
    #3 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() libcxx/include/__functional/function.h:210:12
    #4 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in void std::__u::__function::__policy_invoker<void (llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr,
```
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2024
@ezhulenev
Fix tsan race in PerfJITEventListener.cpp (#106800)
d004ebc 
Static destructor can race with calls to notify and trigger tsan
warning.

```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=5787)
  Write of size 1 at 0x55bec9df8de8 by thread T23:
    #0 pthread_mutex_destroy [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1344](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=1344&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b12affb) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
    #1 __libcpp_recursive_mutex_destroy [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h:91](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h?l=91&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d4e9) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
    #2 std::__tsan::recursive_mutex::~recursive_mutex() [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp:52](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp?l=52&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d4e9)
    #3 ~SmartMutex [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:28](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h?l=28&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaedfe) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
    #4 (anonymous namespace)::PerfJITEventListener::~PerfJITEventListener() [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:65](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=65&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaedfe)
    #5 cxa_at_exit_callback_installed_at(void*) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:437](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=437&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b172cb9) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
    #6 llvm::JITEventListener::createPerfJITEventListener() [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:496](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=496&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcad8f5) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
```
```
Previous atomic read of size 1 at 0x55bec9df8de8 by thread T192 (mutexes: write M0, write M1):
    #0 pthread_mutex_unlock [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1387](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=1387&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b12b6bb) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
    #1 __libcpp_recursive_mutex_unlock [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h:87](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h?l=87&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d589) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
    #2 std::__tsan::recursive_mutex::unlock() [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp:64](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp?l=64&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d589)
    #3 unlock [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:47](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h?l=47&cl=669089572):16 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
    #4 ~lock_guard [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__mutex/lock_guard.h:39](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__mutex/lock_guard.h?l=39&cl=669089572):101 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968)
    #5 (anonymous namespace)::PerfJITEventListener::notifyObjectLoaded(unsigned long, llvm::object::ObjectFile const&, llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo const&) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:290](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=290&cl=669089572):1 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968)
    #6 llvm::orc::RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer::onObjEmit(llvm::orc::MaterializationResponsibility&, llvm::object::OwningBinary<llvm::object::ObjectFile>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager>>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo>>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>>>, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>>>>>, llvm::Error) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:386](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp?l=386&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bc404a8) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c)
```
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2024
@mizvekov
[clang] Implement CWG2398 provisional TTP matching to class templates…
fa65804 
… (#94981)

This extends default argument deduction to cover class templates as
well, applying only to partial ordering, adding to the provisional
wording introduced in llvm/llvm-project#89807.

This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template
template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the
negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by
default.

Given the following example:
```C++
template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A;
template <class T3> struct B;

template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>;   // #1
template <class T6, class T7>                      struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2

template struct B<A<int>>;
```
Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This
patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again.
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
@rorth
[ASan] Disable InstallAtForkHandler on Linux/sparc64 (#108542)
9b237b4 
When SPARC Asan testing is enabled by PR #107405, many Linux/sparc64
tests just hang like
```
#0  0xf7ae8e90 in syscall () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6
#1  0x701065e8 in __sanitizer::FutexWait(__sanitizer::atomic_uint32_t*, unsigned int) ()
    at compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux.cpp:766
#2  0x70107c90 in Wait ()
    at compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.cpp:35
#3  0x700f7cac in Lock ()
    at compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mutex.h:196
#4  Lock ()
    at compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_registry.h:98
#5  LockThreads ()
    at compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_thread.cpp:489
#6  0x700e9c8c in __asan::BeforeFork() ()
    at compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_posix.cpp:157
#7  0xf7ac83f4 in ?? () from /usr/lib32/libc.so.6
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)
```
It turns out that this happens in tests using `internal_fork` (e.g.
invoking `llvm-symbolizer`): unlike most other Linux targets, which use
`clone`, Linux/sparc64 has to use `__fork` instead. While `clone`
doesn't trigger `pthread_atfork` handlers, `__fork` obviously does,
causing the hang.

To avoid this, this patch disables `InstallAtForkHandler` and lets the
ASan tests run to completion.

Tested on `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu`.
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
@Michael137
[lldb][FrameRecognizer] Display the first non-std frame on verbose_tr…
bca5073 
…ap (#108825)

This attempts to improve user-experience when LLDB stops on a
verbose_trap. Currently if a `__builtin_verbose_trap` triggers, we
display the first frame above the call to the verbose_trap. So in the
newly added test case, we would've previously stopped here:
```
(lldb) run
Process 28095 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64)
Process 28095 stopped
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access
    frame #1: 0x0000000100003f5c a.out`std::__1::vector<int>::operator[](this=0x000000016fdfebef size=0, (null)=10) at verbose_trap.cpp:6:9
   3    template <typename T>
   4    struct vector {
   5        void operator[](unsigned) {
-> 6            __builtin_verbose_trap("Bounds error", "out-of-bounds access");
   7        }
   8    };
```

After this patch, we would stop in the first non-`std` frame:
```
(lldb) run
Process 27843 launched: '/Users/michaelbuch/a.out' (arm64)
Process 27843 stopped
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = Bounds error: out-of-bounds access
    frame #2: 0x0000000100003f44 a.out`g() at verbose_trap.cpp:14:5
   11  
   12   void g() {
   13       std::vector<int> v;
-> 14       v[10];
   15   }
   16  
```

rdar://134490328
iclsrc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
@vabridgers
[analyzer] Indicate UnarySymExpr is not supported by Z3 (#108900)
9ca62c5 
Random testing found that the Z3 wrapper does not support UnarySymExpr,
which was added recently and not included in the original Z3 wrapper.
For now, just avoid submitting expressions to Z3 to avoid compiler
crashes.

Some crash context ...

clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core z3-unarysymexpr.c
-analyzer-constraints=z3

Unsupported expression to reason about!
UNREACHABLE executed at
clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/SMTConstraintManager.h:297!

Stack dump:
3. <root>/clang/test/Analysis/z3-unarysymexpr.c:13:7: Error evaluating
branch #0 <addr> llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) #1
<addr> llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() #8 <addr>
clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assumeAux(
llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>,
clang::ento::NonLoc, bool) #9 <addr>
clang::ento::SimpleConstraintManager::assume(
llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>,
clang::ento::NonLoc, bool)

Co-authored-by: einvbri <vince.a.bridgers@ericsson.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vladimirlaz vladimirlaz vladimirlaz left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@lazvlaale @bader @vladimirlaz