Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improved coverage for varnish #601

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 28, 2020
Merged

improved coverage for varnish #601

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 28, 2020

Conversation

SinghHrmn
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

test/test_scanner.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@SinghHrmn SinghHrmn requested a review from terriko April 27, 2020 19:03
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #601 into master will increase coverage by 0.20%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #601      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.20%   84.40%   +0.20%     
==========================================
  Files          63       63              
  Lines        2494     2494              
  Branches      497      497              
==========================================
+ Hits         2100     2105       +5     
+ Misses        270      266       -4     
+ Partials      124      123       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
#longtests 84.40% <ø> (+0.20%) ⬆️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
test/test_scanner.py 93.15% <ø> (ø)
cve_bin_tool/checkers/varnish.py 100.00% <0.00%> (+27.77%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bd5d4ce...cae4997. Read the comment docs.

@terriko terriko merged commit 1834d4b into intel:master Apr 28, 2020
@SinghHrmn SinghHrmn deleted the varnish branch April 29, 2020 00:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants