-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 456
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: add additional bad archive tests #1322
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You need to commit the respective empty files too.
Take a look at #1285
You can create one using touch empty-file.<extension>
in linux systems in the asset directory
You can enable Run
Also don't forget to commit according to https://conventionalcommits.org |
Hello @BreadGenie, Yes, I absolutely missed that part. So, I need to create a folder test/assets and inside it I would have to pass the blank files with name |
I was going to ask about this just now. Seeing all those red crosses got me worried. |
Yep |
This commit is of type |
Yep. |
ok cool! I am committing now. Pre commit showed passed for both the lintings. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1322 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 78.89% 79.08% +0.19%
==========================================
Files 271 271
Lines 4865 4881 +16
Branches 585 585
==========================================
+ Hits 3838 3860 +22
+ Misses 875 872 -3
+ Partials 152 149 -3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
here comes the fresh commit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
nitpick: PR description could have fix #1305
instead of issue #1305
@P0intMaN you can join our gitter chat it'd be much easier to get help there |
Ok joining right away! |
Not really sure why the one test in python 3.7 failed, but it looks like it could be a transient network error, so I'm going to re-run CI. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good! Now that we've got 6 files instead of 2 we might want to refactor the filename stuff at the top so it's not so repetitive, but that doesn't have to happen in this pull request.
Additional test_bad_* added. (fix #1305)