Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update doc #1216

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 30, 2021
Merged

Update doc #1216

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 30, 2021

Conversation

hathach
Copy link
Owner

@hathach hathach commented Nov 29, 2021

Describe the PR
update supported list

@hathach hathach merged commit 9775e76 into master Nov 30, 2021
@hathach hathach deleted the update-doc branch November 30, 2021 05:02
@perigoso
Copy link
Collaborator

good job, looks great 👍

@hathach
Copy link
Owner Author

hathach commented Nov 30, 2021

Thanks, it takes me too much time to edit the table with retext app. Which app do you use to edit rst file ?

@HiFiPhile
Copy link
Collaborator

In the table LPC43xx missed highspeed support :)

@perigoso
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, it takes me too much time to edit the table with retext app. Which app do you use to edit rst file ?

I have some restructuredtext extensions on vscode, i made the table in csv and one of the extensions formated it to rst, i honestly dont know which did what
To edit Is a bit harder, never had to deal with a big table like this so never really looked into it, usually just do it by hand (this one is too big to be dealing with that though)

@perigoso
Copy link
Collaborator

There are other supported table formats, maybe CSV would be good here, very simple.
I chose this because it allowed some fancier things like joined rows for the same manufacturer (which i think works great)

@hathach
Copy link
Owner Author

hathach commented Dec 1, 2021

There are other supported table formats, maybe CSV would be good here, very simple. I chose this because it allowed some fancier things like joined rows for the same manufacturer (which i think works great)

yeah, I agree, this format look great, though editing it is a bit of a pain. though I get used to it already.

In the table LPC43xx missed highspeed support :)

right, will correct it next

@kbladewht

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants