-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
/sbin/ifup eth1 2> /dev/null #1777
Comments
This often means you already have another VM running with the same IP address. |
I've had this problem before. For me, it was related to this "notabug" bug from redhat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491432 where ethX doesn't always refer to the same interface if you don't have HWADDR set in the ifcfg-ethX file. |
I need a lot more information:
|
I have the same bug, it happens when I set the IP address manually Vagrantfile excerpt:
From the host I get:
From within the VM:
eth1 has not been configured. I suspect the If you tell me how to print debug level logs, I can try to provide them in this thread. |
I ran into this tonight as well. Let me preface this with saying I'm doing some stuff well beyond Vagrant's intended usage - so I'm not asking for support, just providing more information so that @mitchellh can debug other's issues if need be. In my case, I just remove all of the VMs directly from within VirtualBox and spin them back up with Vagrant. I'm only in need of one at a time but have multiple copies of it from time to time during the process of packaging. To reproduce (not sure if all steps required, particularly the "in VirtualBox" steps):
Vagrantfiles, logs and my launcher script can be found here. |
remove /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules before packing works for me. |
I just ran into this using a packaged box. My Vagrantfile is this: Vagrant.configure("2") do |config|
config.vm.box = "centos64"
config.vm.box_url = "http://developer.nrel.gov/downloads/vagrant-boxes/CentOS-6.4-x86_64-v20130427.box"
config.vm.network :public_network
end I packaged like this: vagrant package --output webv3.27jun2013-2.box --vagrantfile Vagrantfile I suspended the first vm: vagrant suspend I added the box and initialized a directory: vagrant box add testing http://10.1.15.7:7007/webv3.27jun2013-2.box
mkdir foo
cd foo
vagrant init testing Then
The guest OS is CentOS (see the box in the top Vagrantfile) |
remove /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules before packing works for me too. |
@mconigliaro is RIGHT. It must be some VMs still running with network config same as what you want to run. I |
Deleting /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and removing mac entries from ifcfg-eth0 then re-creating the box file (CentOS6.4) and then doing a fresh vagrant up did not work for me. |
Centos 6.4 worked fine for me. |
Vagrant 1.2.7 I modified the box (http://developer.nrel.gov/downloads/vagrant-boxes/CentOS-6.4-i386-v20130427.box) like installing httpd, mysql, etc, then simply packaged it. After that, I attempted to vagrant this package up. But following error came up. [node1] Configuring and enabling network interfaces... The following SSH command responded with a non-zero exit status. Vagrant assumes that this means the command failed! /sbin/ifup eth1 2> /dev/null So I did #VAGRANT-BEGIN # The contents below are automatically generated by Vagrant. Do not modify. BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.33.10 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 DEVICE=eth1 PEERDNS=no #VAGRANT-END #VAGRANT-BEGIN # The contents below are automatically generated by Vagrant. Do not modify. BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.33.10 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 DEVICE=eth1 PEERDNS=no #VAGRANT-END #VAGRANT-BEGIN # The contents below are automatically generated by Vagrant. Do not modify. BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.33.10 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 DEVICE=eth1 PEERDNS=no #VAGRANT-END Not related to how many times I did 48 retryable(:on => Vagrant::Errors::VagrantError, :tries => 3, :sleep => 2) do
49 machine.communicate.sudo("/sbin/ifdown eth#{interface} 2> /dev/null", :error_check => false)
50 machine.communicate.sudo("cat /tmp/vagrant-network-entry_#{interface} >> #{network_scripts_di r}/ifcfg-eth#{interface}")
51 machine.communicate.sudo("ARPCHECK=no /sbin/ifup eth#{interface} 2> /dev/null")
52 end Hope this issue to be fixed :) |
I'm also having the same problem than @XXBlackieXX , but using http://puppet-vagrant-boxes.puppetlabs.com/centos-64-x64-vbox4210.box ... Any ideia when this issue will be fixed ? |
After updating vagrant to 1.2.7, and using a private ip starting on .2, since .1 I get the following error There are errors in the configuration of this machine. Please fix the following errors and try again: vm: it started working correctly, the ip I've used is 10.0.5.2 |
After investigating a bit more, I found out that the problem is related with the eth card. If you choose a different card (i.e. wlan0) it works correctly. |
This was related to boxes it appears. Closing. Thanks! |
Has the behaviour for bringing up a private network changed between v1.3.5..v1.4.0? Previously, Vagrant was able to bring up the second network interface, eth1, but this now fails in v1.4.0. I've patched[1] my Vagrant box so that it always activates eth1 on boot now but this wasn't required before. So is this still an issue for boxes to be concerned about or a new bug in Vagrant? |
@tmatilai Cheers for the info! |
Debian squeeze
Worked for me too. |
To my point of view and what i do for my CentOS box is: --Each MAC should be unique, so if you have HWADDR or UUID in your box/template ifcfg-eth0 your clones will obtain the same. So you have to delete them for your box before packaging. before packaging: You create the box with "vagrant package" and you should have any issues while create new hosts based on that box |
Having the same issue with this setup:
Host:
Guest:
Running |
those are issues with the boxes, rather than vagrant. glad you fix the box. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Svpernova09 notifications@github.51.alwrote:
|
I assume this is related to the wiki page " |
Adding some information concerning the udev problem in Debian Squeeze: udev persists the mapping MAC address <-> interface name in the file If you delete that file before packaging, it will be created again at the next boot. There are actually some rules already to not create this mapping inside a virtual machine. Unfortunately the required rule for Virtualbox was only added in Wheezy. Fix for Debian SqueezeTo fix this permanently, you need to:
$ cp /lib/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules /etc/udev/rules.d/
# ignore interfaces with locally administered or null MAC addresses
# and KVM and VMWare virtual interfaces
ENV{MATCHADDR}=="?[2367abef]:*", ENV{MATCHADDR}=""
ENV{MATCHADDR}=="00:00:00:00:00:00", ENV{MATCHADDR}=""
ENV{MATCHADDR}=="00:0c:29:*|00:50:56:*", ENV{MATCHADDR}=""
ENV{MATCHADDR}=="52:54:00:*|54:52:00:*", ENV{MATCHADDR}=""
ENV{MATCHADDR}=="08:00:27:*", ENV{MATCHADDR}=""
$ rm -rf /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules That's it! For more about udev rules files see the section Rules files in the udev manual. |
@bmorg I really appreciate the response, that information is really helpful. Does Vagrant provide some sort of FAQ for building a .box file? I should have given more info here, but I did give more information on the mailing list (see here). I assume this issues presents itself in a handful of linux environments (not just debian-based distros)? |
This is an issue for me and others on my team.
|
Any fix for a *.box file that did not first have the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules file removed? I'm stuck... |
you should be able to 'vagrant ssh' into it. then remove the line and reboot 2014-09-25 15:20 GMT+01:00 Ryan Schmidt notifications@github.com:
|
Thanks so much @tsigian! This fixed it for me: #1777 (comment) |
I have a VirtualBox VM that is set up as a DHCP, DNS, and firewall that has an IP of 192.168.1.1. This VM serves Internet access to the rest of my VMs. Vagrant not allowing me to use a .1 address for that VM is really going to cause headaches going forward. Is there any way to force Vagrant to allow me to use 192.168.1.1? |
I had a similar problem on a slow network, I commented Here's what I had before:
|
I added a second network: And got the same error but for some reason, it was because eth2 was the created interface and not eth1... Fixed with: |
I've sold it like this: holms/vagrant-centos7-box@030375653a |
I gave up on this long ago, (not long after my previous comment) and I ran into this again tonight where CentOS 7 wasn't getting the private_network interface, wanted to mention that @holms comment of adding |
Just running vagrant up, seeing the issue described above, I was able to resolve this by just running vagrant ssh, then removing /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules, exiting, running vagrant halt; vagrant up and all was fine. |
I uninstalled vagrant and virtualbox and reinstalled, there was no problem again. |
Getting this on bento/ubuntu-16-04 box. :( |
I am getting this error on ubutnu 16.04. I guess the cause is that ubuntu now uses different names for ethernet interfaces:
|
I agree with balous and I have the same problem. what should I do next? |
Getting this on Note, private networking works with geerlingguy/ubuntu1604. Not really sure what he did to get it working. |
Was able to fix this with a complete uninstall of vagrant and adding the box again. Followed the uninstallation directions here. |
Thanks for @masonfox |
I have something similarly related in #8373 on Centos7. I did the following
|
@pgporada you are a hero!!!!! |
I fixed it! SO: Ubuntu 16.04.2 I had vagrant installed via apt-get, but it seems to be broken/downgraded/bugged.
|
I use Mint 18.2 and apt version of vagrant was failing with same error. Installation of newer release from Vagrant's official website solved the problem (see explanation at https://askubuntu.com/questions/760871/network-settings-fail-for-ubuntu-xenial64-vagrant-box). |
This may not be the fix for most but i ran into this problem today and this was the first result on google sudo apt-get install ifupdown Worked perfectly straight after |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
Error
I've tried the following
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: