Add support for vecN<i32> and vecN<u32> to dot() function
#1689
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kvark
reviewed
Jan 24, 2022
kvark
requested changes
Jan 28, 2022
|
I implemented the requested changes. On MSL and GLSL back I think I did a pretty good job so far. When refactoring the sum of components into a loop I incorporated the x as well, and therefore there will be an extra "+" sign at the beginning of the produced expression. Let me know if you like it or not. If not, I will move the product of x outside of the loop. On spv back, I tried my best to reduce repetition, but perhaps I wrote some "clever code" that is just "confusing and obscure" code for something that could have been done much easier. |
This is because I wanted to highlight the fact that the correct id is used in the last sum of the integer dot product expression
since it could not fail, changed it to simply return `void`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Work-in-progress pull request to fix #1667
Right now I have only implemented this for glsl-out to get an early review.
By reading the discussion at gpuweb/gpuweb#2231 and the minutes in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o3BrMEZnE3Yat95uLiY06opF2Hmcj5XGlQmBhTT-_dQ/edit# I understand that:
dot()function will just workdot()call into an arithmetic expression.