[SR] Add custom redaction options

[romtsn]

📜 Description

• Added a possibility to redact/ignore view types by adding the fq class name to the redact/ignore list in replay options
  • This will also consider subclasses of the added view type (e.g. EditText will be redacted because it inherits from TextView)
• Added a possibility to redact/ignore certain views by setting a tag
  • Either a regular setTag("sentry-redact|sentry-ignore")
  • Or in case of multiple tags for a view setTag(R.id.sentry_privacy, "redact|ignore")
• Added convenient view extensions that set tags under the hood
• Removed the redactAllText and redactAllImages booleans in favour of just adding the android view classes to the redactClasses list
• Some minor fixes along-the-way in Windows.kt where we were not properly handling double-init of the SDK

Also note that the order in which we define whether to redact a view or not matters, and marking individual views has precedence over a class. You can read up more on it here: https://www.notion.so/sentry/Redaction-Ignore-Mechanisms-for-Views-45e1302e8d844bd0b83a274a5d759e3f

💡 Motivation and Context

Part of getsentry/sentry#74441

💚 How did you test it?

Manually + automated

📝 Checklist

• I reviewed the submitted code.
• I added tests to verify the changes.
• No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
• I updated the docs if needed.
• Review from the native team if needed.
• [] No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
• No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

🔮 Next steps

[romtsn]

@brustolin @bruno-garcia I guess we should align on naming here. Do you prefer this or redactViewTypes? I'm fine with either

[brustolin]

I think we should align but just Classes is too generic, what about "redactViewClasses"?

[romtsn]

yeah, sounds good. I can also change it to redactViewTypes so you don't have to :)

[github-actions]

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	399.69 ms	499.12 ms	99.43 ms
Size	1.70 MiB	2.35 MiB	661.11 KiB

Previous results on branch: rz/feat/session-replay-custom-redaction

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
2c39e81	540.60 ms	628.22 ms	87.62 ms
631f884	389.28 ms	439.36 ms	50.08 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
2c39e81	1.70 MiB	2.35 MiB	661.12 KiB
631f884	1.70 MiB	2.35 MiB	661.11 KiB

[brustolin]

Looks good to me.

One question: We just need to redact TextView? All the input views are based on TextView?

[brustolin]

l: Why is this deprecated?

[romtsn]

I explained in a comment on top of the file, but basically we scream to the dev that this should not be used to get the value. This extension only exists to set the value conveniently in Kotlin (redactAllText = true instead of setRedactAllText(true)), so only the setter matters here

[brustolin]

Thanks!! I didn't get the comment.

Can you just remove get() as in C# where you can have a property with just a setter?

[romtsn]

nope, unfortunately not possible in Kotlin. It's possible to only have a getter without a setter, but not the other way around

[romtsn]

Looks good to me.

One question: We just need to redact TextView? All the input views are based on TextView?

yep, EditText, RadioButton and others all inherit from TextView

[markushi]

LGTM!