You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Vue CLI is now in maintenance mode, so I think we should start planning to move to Vite.
Some of the performance issues described in Why Vite? sound familiar. In particular, right now it feels like build time is reducing the cadence of testing locally for us: even if tests themselves run quickly, it takes some seconds to start them.
I had interpreted a comment on a Vue I18n repository here as meaning that Vue I18n will stop working with Vue CLI. But looking at it slightly more closely, I think they're still planning to support webpack, just with something other than @intlify/vue-i18n-loader. Though as @sadiqkhoja has noted, vue-cli-plugin-i18n also doesn't seem to be well maintained.
We don't have much custom webpack configuration: I think what little there is is just in vue.config.js. Hopefully that will ease the transition to Vite.
Probably the hardest part of transitioning to Vite will be figuring out testing. Will we still be able to use Karma? Right now we use karma-webpack to get Karma working with webpack. Vite seems to use Rollup, and from a glance, there do seem to be ways to get Karma working with Rollup. That said, I have no particular love of Karma. Since Karma is no longer recommended within the Vue community, some testing things haven't always worked out-of-the-box for us. Looking at the Vue 3 testing guide, it looks like Vitest is the current recommendation. It'd be nice though if we could somehow sequence things so that we don't have to transition off Vue CLI and Karma at the same time. Could we move from Vue CLI to Vite in one step, initially setting up Karma to work with Rollup, then in a next step move from Karma to something like Vitest?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Vue CLI is now in maintenance mode, so I think we should start planning to move to Vite.
Some of the performance issues described in Why Vite? sound familiar. In particular, right now it feels like build time is reducing the cadence of testing locally for us: even if tests themselves run quickly, it takes some seconds to start them.
I had interpreted a comment on a Vue I18n repository here as meaning that Vue I18n will stop working with Vue CLI. But looking at it slightly more closely, I think they're still planning to support webpack, just with something other than
@intlify/vue-i18n-loader
. Though as @sadiqkhoja has noted,vue-cli-plugin-i18n
also doesn't seem to be well maintained.We don't have much custom webpack configuration: I think what little there is is just in vue.config.js. Hopefully that will ease the transition to Vite.
Probably the hardest part of transitioning to Vite will be figuring out testing. Will we still be able to use Karma? Right now we use
karma-webpack
to get Karma working with webpack. Vite seems to use Rollup, and from a glance, there do seem to be ways to get Karma working with Rollup. That said, I have no particular love of Karma. Since Karma is no longer recommended within the Vue community, some testing things haven't always worked out-of-the-box for us. Looking at the Vue 3 testing guide, it looks like Vitest is the current recommendation. It'd be nice though if we could somehow sequence things so that we don't have to transition off Vue CLI and Karma at the same time. Could we move from Vue CLI to Vite in one step, initially setting up Karma to work with Rollup, then in a next step move from Karma to something like Vitest?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: