Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(starters): upgrade gatsby version for all starters #11382

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 29, 2019
Merged

fix(starters): upgrade gatsby version for all starters #11382

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 29, 2019

Conversation

DSchau
Copy link
Contributor

@DSchau DSchau commented Jan 29, 2019

Description

This fixes the security violation which was being triggered by webpack@3.1.11 (low severity).

➜ cat package-lock.json | grep webpack-dev-server
        "webpack-dev-server": "^3.1.14",
    "webpack-dev-server": {
      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/webpack-dev-server/-/webpack-dev-server-3.1.14.tgz",

cc @KyleAMathews

@DSchau DSchau requested a review from a team as a code owner January 29, 2019 13:31
@DSchau
Copy link
Contributor Author

DSchau commented Jan 29, 2019

Wait until #11383 is merged and published, and then bump any of the (new) packages that were specified.

m-allanson
m-allanson approved these changes Jan 29, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@m-allanson m-allanson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@pieh pieh merged commit 78a886c into gatsbyjs:master Jan 29, 2019
pragmaticpat pushed a commit to pragmaticpat/gatsby that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2022
fix(starters): upgrade gatsby version for all starters (gatsbyjs#11382)
f01150b 
* fix(starters): upgrade gatsby version for all starters

* chore: bump offline and sharp as well

* chore: remove unused plugin

* chore: update deps (final?!)
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2023
Open
@Rutam21 Rutam21 mentioned this pull request Jul 2, 2023
Open
@MaxMood96 MaxMood96 mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2023
Open
@nidhi42 nidhi42 mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2023
Open
@impactyogi impactyogi mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2023
Open
@MaxMood96 MaxMood96 mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2023
Open
@Rutam21 Rutam21 mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2023
Open
@nidhi42 nidhi42 mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2023
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2023
Open
@nidhi42 nidhi42 mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2023
Open
@tonyg101 tonyg101 mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2023
Open
@Rutam21 Rutam21 mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2023
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2023
Open
@MaxMood96 MaxMood96 mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2023
Open
@joeawillis joeawillis mentioned this pull request Dec 3, 2023
Open
@Rutam21 Rutam21 mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2023
Open
@nidhi42 nidhi42 mentioned this pull request Dec 25, 2023
Open
@MaxMood96 MaxMood96 mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2024
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2024
Open
@nidhi42 nidhi42 mentioned this pull request May 15, 2024
Open
@MaxMood96 MaxMood96 mentioned this pull request May 15, 2024
Open
@nidhi42 nidhi42 mentioned this pull request May 15, 2024
Open
@Rutam21 Rutam21 mentioned this pull request May 16, 2024
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request May 16, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@m-allanson m-allanson m-allanson approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@DSchau @m-allanson @pieh