Skip to content

Question about Signer CRDT #179

Answered by horsefacts
Ankarrr asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Signers moved on chain to the KeyRegistry contract as part of FIP-7. You're right, there are still some references to the old CRDT in the spec doc.

The new equivalent to "m.signer must be a valid Signer in the add-set of the Signer CRDT for message.fid" is "m.signer must be a valid key with Keystate.ADDED in the KeyRegistry contract for message.fid."

Replies: 3 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by horsefacts
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants