Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: fix server_test.go #18582

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

clement2026
Copy link
Contributor

@clement2026 clement2026 commented Sep 13, 2024

#18494 creates a non-empty raft log snapshot on server startup, which requires:

  1. There are available entries in raft log.
  2. A non-nil kv is set :
    func (s *EtcdServer) snapshot(snapi uint64, confState raftpb.ConfState) {
    d := GetMembershipInfoInV2Format(s.Logger(), s.cluster)
    // commit kv to write metadata (for example: consistent index) to disk.
    //
    // This guarantees that Backend's consistent_index is >= index of last snapshot.
    //
    // KV().commit() updates the consistent index in backend.
    // All operations that update consistent index must be called sequentially
    // from applyAll function.
    // So KV().Commit() cannot run in parallel with toApply. It has to be called outside
    // the go routine created below.
    s.KV().Commit()

This PR fixes the failed tests in server_test.go by :

  1. Appending raft log entries by sending a put request to raft.Node's readyc
  2. Setting a non-nil kv for EtcdServer

Part of #17098

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @clement2026. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Signed-off-by: Clement <gh.2lgqz@aleeas.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 13, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.88%. Comparing base (981061a) to head (f39b328).

Current head f39b328 differs from pull request most recent head 6336424

Please upload reports for the commit 6336424 to get more accurate results.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

see 23 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #18582      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.73%   68.88%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35474    35474              
==========================================
+ Hits        24382    24438      +56     
+ Misses       9666     9617      -49     
+ Partials     1426     1419       -7     

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 981061a...6336424. Read the comment docs.

@clement2026 clement2026 changed the title fix: server_test.go tests: fix server_test.go Sep 13, 2024
@clement2026 clement2026 marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2024 02:09
Signed-off-by: Clement <gh.2lgqz@aleeas.com>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: clement2026, serathius

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@serathius
Copy link
Member

cc @ahrtr

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Sep 13, 2024

The change is simple and straightforward, but let's get #18494 (comment) clarified firstly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants