Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Continue making readonly more explicit #1716

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

andchiind
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@andchiind andchiind added backend Backend related functionality improvement Improvement to existing functionality labels Aug 12, 2024
@andchiind andchiind self-assigned this Aug 12, 2024
@andchiind andchiind force-pushed the readonly-true-default branch 4 times, most recently from eec7f00 to 3a9ef0f Compare August 16, 2024 13:00
Copy link

🔔 Changes in database folder detected 🔔
Do these changes require adding new migrations? 🤔 In that case follow these steps.
If you are uncertain, ask a database admin on the team 😄

@andchiind andchiind force-pushed the readonly-true-default branch 2 times, most recently from 99b7d60 to 597b515 Compare August 16, 2024 13:18
@andchiind andchiind marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2024 13:55
@andchiind
Copy link
Contributor Author

There is a test failing now which wasn't failing before this PR. In my testing this seems to come down to timing, which in my opinion hints that we may need to rethink that test. The timings have now changed since readonly operations are faster.

@andchiind
Copy link
Contributor Author

See #1730

@andchiind andchiind closed this Aug 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backend Backend related functionality improvement Improvement to existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant