Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change/fix pipeline for mode 'scc-raw-stack' #371

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MichaelSt98
Copy link
Collaborator

Not sure whether I am missing something, but shouldn't the SCCRawStackPipeline be called for mode scc-raw-stack?

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Documentation for this branch can be viewed at https://sites.ecmwf.int/docs/loki/371/index.html

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.40%. Comparing base (1f87624) to head (9a74a77).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #371   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.40%   95.40%           
=======================================
  Files         178      178           
  Lines       37267    37297   +30     
=======================================
+ Hits        35555    35585   +30     
  Misses       1712     1712           
Flag Coverage Δ
lint_rules 96.39% <ø> (ø)
loki 95.39% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mlange05 mlange05 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it should! Thanks for finding this! 🙏

@reuterbal reuterbal merged commit 7748c24 into main Sep 2, 2024
13 checks passed
@reuterbal reuterbal deleted the nams-fix-pipeline branch September 2, 2024 11:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants