Build Windows NativeAOT runtime packs

[filipnavara]

Contributes to #87060. These are the last missing runtime packs. We can update the list in dotnet/installer next, and switch to using PublishAotUsingRuntimePack unconditionally for .NET 9 in SDK. Then we can remove the duplicate files from ILCompiler packages.

I locally tested that it's possible to build and use win-x64 runtime pack (after it's added to the list).

[ghost]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

Contributes to #87060. These are the last missing runtime packs. We can update the list in dotnet/installer next, and switch to using PublishAotUsingRuntimePack unconditionally for .NET 9 in SDK. Then we can remove the duplicate files from ILCompiler packages.

I locally tested that it's possible to build and use win-x64 runtime pack (after it's added to the list).

Author:	filipnavara
Assignees:	-
Labels:	area-Infrastructure-installer, community-contribution, area-NativeAOT-coreclr
Milestone:	-

[MichalStrehovsky]

Thanks!

[MartyIX]

Just out of curiosity: Is the term "runtime pack" explained somewhere?

[MichalStrehovsky]

Just out of curiosity: Is the term "runtime pack" explained somewhere?

It's an implementation detail of the .NET SDK. It's a NuGet package that contains the libraries built out of this repo.

For Native AOT we currently package the libraries together with the compiler into a single NuGet and replace the coreclr-based runtime pack at publish time. This PR moves us towards not having to do this replacement.