[linux-bionic] Skip failing NTLM tests

[steveisok]

Some NTLM tests are still running and failing even though libSystem.Net.Security.Native isn't being built for linux-bionic. This PR skips them all.

[ghost]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl, @bartonjs, @vcsjones
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

Some NTLM tests are still running and failing even though libSystem.Net.Security.Native isn't being built for linux-bionic. This PR skips them all.

Author:	steveisok
Assignees:	steveisok
Labels:	area-System.Net.Security
Milestone:	-

[steveisok]

/azp run runtime-linuxbionic

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[wfurt]

should we include the managed implementation? That should just work without GSSAP AFAIK.
cc: @filipnavara

[steveisok]

should we include the managed implementation? That should just work without GSSAP AFAIK. cc: @filipnavara

Ah, yes, I think we should.

[filipnavara]

We should but there was not any product-level check that we are running on linux-bionic.

[am11]

We should but there was not any product-level check that we are running on linux-bionic.

It is possible to test:

if (RuntimeInformation.RuntimeIdentifier.StartsWith("linux-bionic")) ForBionic();
else if (RuntimeInformation.RuntimeIdentifier.StartsWith("linux-musl")) ForMusl();
else ForGlibC();

[filipnavara]

It is possible to test:

Hmm. I though there's a reason why the test check is implemented differently. If RuntimeInformation.RuntimeIdentifier returns the correct information then we likely just need to modify this condition:

runtime/src/libraries/System.Net.Security/src/System/Net/NegotiateAuthenticationPal.Unix.cs

Line 25 in 8dad137

OperatingSystem.IsMacOS() || OperatingSystem.IsIOS() || OperatingSystem.IsMacCatalyst();

and add || (OperationSystem.IsLinux() && RuntimeInformation.RuntimeIdentifier.StartsWith("linux-bionic")).

[adamsitnik]

Please solve the merge conflict.

I am requesting changes mostly so this PR does not show up at the next Stale PRs email ;)

[steveisok]

For whatever reason, this doesn't appear to be failing in CI any longer.