-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft for Min/Max intrinsics xarch (#65625) #65700
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You want to use
emitIns_SIMD_R_R_R
which will take care ofVEX
vsnon-VEX
differencesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd actually also expect we want to handle things like containment/etc in which case lowering to a HWIntrinsic might be simpler overall
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agree, manual containment management is quite verbose
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tannergooding Thank you for the advice. I'm sorry , but could you tell me more about the containments?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Normally each node is processed by the JIT and will individually get register assignments and code generated for it. Containment is the term used to mean that a node should not be handled that way and instead is handled directly by its parent node.
So by default, if you have something like
GT_HWINTRINSIC NI_System_Math_Max
and it has a child node likeGT_IND float
you would end up generatingHowever, if you mark the
GT_IND
as "contained", then you can handle these together and emit justmaxss reg1, [mem]
.There is a lot of existing logic for supporting containment (https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/coreclr/jit/lowerxarch.cpp#L6030) and so it would likely be better to lower or import
NI_System_Math_Max
to be the relevantHWIntrinsic
node(s) instead so that much of this handling implicitly lights up, rather than having to duplicate it just for theNI_System_Math_Max
node.If you were to do it the other way, by just handling
NI_System_Math_Max
, then it would likely be done around here: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/coreclr/jit/lowerxarch.cpp#L5371-L5387