Remove overriding of relational annotations #8512
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #7166
Since we now build one model per database provider there is no need to allow relational and provider-specific overrides to exist together in the same model. This means that any relational annotation will always be prefixed with "Relational:" and never with, for example, "SqlServer:". Provider-specific annotations still use the provider prefix.
This particularly advantageous for the consumer, since to read, for example, the table name, a consumer only ever needs to read
entityType.Relational().TableName;
instead of having to handle the case where it has been overridden for the current provider.Note: there is other API (e.g. ForSqlServerTableName) than can also be removed; that will be part of another PR.
Breaking change baselines not updated yet.