-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DBAL-563] Add definition of sequence emulated identity platforms #428
Conversation
Hello, thank you for creating this pull request. I have automatically opened an issue http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DBAL-680 We use Jira to track the state of pull requests and the versions they got |
* @since 2.5 | ||
* @link www.doctrine-project.org | ||
*/ | ||
interface SequenceEmulatedIdentityPlatform |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is inconsistent with the way other methods are implemented. You should add a new method in AbstractPlatform instead
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@stof I know that. I talked with @guilhermeblanco about this and he suggested to do it like this. In fact I think extracting an interface for vendor specific features/behaviours like this is not a bad idea instead of bloating the AbstractPlatform
more and more. But if this is not desired I can change that back of course...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@deeky666 For now we bloat the AbstractPlatform
and use a not implemented exception. At somepoint in the future we can think about refactoring approaches. No need to start introducing two ways and make itinconsistent imho.
@beberlei Applied the desired changes. |
@beberlei rebased. What's your opinion of this approach? |
[DBAL-563] Add definition of sequence emulated identity platforms
Currently identity columns on Oracle are implemented with a trigger and sequence workaround to be compatible with IDENTITY generator strategy in ORM. However, using this strategy, the last insert ID is never returned when persisting, as the sequence name generated by DBAL is not passed to the ID-Generator instance in ORM and thus not passed to the driver when calling
IdentityGenerator::generate()
. Therefore the Oracle driver always returns null in this case. This makes this strategy unusable.A similar case is given in PostgreSQL where
SERIAL
identity columns need a sequence in order to work. There is a hackish implementation available in ORM for this case which makes it work.It is possible that other vendors (when implemented) encounter the same issue. For this reason I tried to create a general solution with this PR.
ORM needs to know which platforms do not have native support for identity columns but can emulate them with sequences. To prepare this I added platform methods that identify a platform being able to do so. Platforms supporting this have to return the name of the sequence used for an identity column in a table. ORM can later make use of this and pass it to the
IdentityGenerator
so that the underlying driver in return is able to supply the last insert ID.Current supporting platforms are PostgreSQL and Oracle.