Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for #386 #432

Merged
merged 44 commits into from
Dec 3, 2020
Merged

Fixes for #386 #432

merged 44 commits into from
Dec 3, 2020

Conversation

nfx
Copy link
Contributor

@nfx nfx commented Dec 3, 2020

  • Rebased on top of recent refactoring
  • Almost entire feature is done by @tcz001

tcz001 and others added 30 commits October 26, 2020 12:45
dependabot bot and others added 14 commits December 3, 2020 21:52
Bumps [github.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttp](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttp) from 0.6.7 to 0.6.8.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttp/releases)
- [Commits](hashicorp/go-retryablehttp@v0.6.7...v0.6.8)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
* `network_error_messages` and `verify_workspace_runnning` from `databricks_mws_workspaces` is deprecated and going to be removed in 0.3.
* `error_messages` from `databricks_mws_networks` are deprecated and would be removed in 0.3.
* `ebs_volume_type` and `azure_disk_volume_type` from `databricks_instance_pool` is going to be moved to `disk_type` sub-block in 0.3, which means you'll slightly have to modify configuration while migrating to 0.3.
* `databricks_notebook` & `databricks_dbfs_file` field `content` is deprecated and would be renamed to `content_base64` to further increase clarity.
* `databricks_dbfs_file` has got `content`, `content_b64_md5`, `overwrite`, `mkdirs`, `validate_remote_file` fields deprecated and they will be removed in the next version, where critical code path will be shared with `databricks_notebook`.
So this will offload ID format maintainance to SDK
@nfx nfx merged commit 7a3ee43 into master Dec 3, 2020
@nfx nfx deleted the pr/386 branch December 3, 2020 21:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants