chore(ci): add coderabbit settings #5928
Conversation
crodriguezvega
requested review from
colin-axner,
AdityaSripal,
charleenfei,
damiannolan,
chatton and
DimitrisJim
as code owners
WalkthroughThe update introduces the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (1)
- .coderabbit.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
.coderabbit.yml (5)
- 1-1: The language setting is correctly specified as "en". This ensures that all automated responses and reviews will be in English, which is standard for most development projects and should align with the project's primary language for communication.
- 2-2: Early access features are disabled (
early_access: false). This is a prudent choice for a production environment to ensure stability and avoid potential issues with untested features.- 3-20: The
reviewssection is well-structured, providing clear instructions for different paths within the project. It covers Golang code style, integration and end-to-end tests, unit tests, and documentation. This structured approach ensures that reviews are focused and adhere to specific quality standards. However, it's important to ensure that the Uber Golang style guide is the desired standard for this project, as different projects may prefer different style guides.- 21-29: The
auto_reviewconfiguration is enabled, which can significantly streamline the review process by automatically handling certain types of pull requests. The settings to ignore drafts and PRs with titles containing "WIP" or "DO NOT MERGE" are sensible, as these are typically not ready for review. Specifyingbase_branchesas "main" ensures that the automation is focused on the primary development branch. This configuration is well-thought-out and should enhance the efficiency of the review process.- 29-30: Enabling
auto_replyin thechatconfiguration is a useful feature for maintaining engagement and providing immediate feedback on simple queries or actions within the project's communication channels. This should improve the responsiveness of the project's maintainers or contributors.
| reviews: | ||
| request_changes_workflow: false | ||
| high_level_summary: true | ||
| poem: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤔 now I'm curious as to what this is :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I know, I know... It was a tough decision... :)
| review_status: true | ||
| collapse_walkthrough: true | ||
| path_instructions: | ||
| - path: "**/*.go" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we exclude *.pb.go files from review?
| "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request" | ||
| - path: "**/*.md" | ||
| instructions: | | ||
| "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
overall lgtm, we can tweak settings as appropriate later on. Wonder if these setting cover PRs opened in draft mode (I see WIP in titles as a filtering mechanism) but having it not go ape when in draft might be a good idea.
edit: there is a setting and we set to false, so should be gtg
Yeah, I prefer to keep the rabbit out of the draft PRs for now. Since they are not ready for review, it might just be a bit noisy. |
| poem: false | ||
| review_status: true | ||
| collapse_walkthrough: true | ||
| path_filters: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should we also add .mod/.sum here to exclude what typically is a dependabot PR?
Description
Let's unleash the 🐰!
closes: #XXXX
Commit Message / Changelog Entry
see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).godoccomments.Files changedin the Github PR explorer.Codecov Reportin the comment section below once CI passes.Summary by CodeRabbit
.coderabbit.ymlconfiguration.