Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Remove x/bank MsgMultiSend #12433

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

likhita-809
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Closes: #12397


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 4, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #12433 (eee452f) into main (ff3947a) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #12433      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.63%   65.58%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         683      687       +4     
  Lines       71549    71344     -205     
==========================================
- Hits        46959    46788     -171     
+ Misses      21948    21916      -32     
+ Partials     2642     2640       -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
codec/types/interface_registry.go 53.96% <ø> (ø)
x/bank/client/testutil/cli_helpers.go 50.00% <ø> (-23.69%) ⬇️
x/bank/client/testutil/suite.go 99.36% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️
x/bank/keeper/msg_server.go 5.00% <ø> (+1.96%) ⬆️
x/bank/keeper/send.go 84.27% <ø> (+0.52%) ⬆️
x/bank/types/codec.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
x/bank/types/msgs.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
x/bank/simulation/operations.go 72.38% <100.00%> (-7.94%) ⬇️
x/group/keeper/keeper.go 58.26% <0.00%> (-0.40%) ⬇️
... and 6 more

@likhita-809 likhita-809 marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2022 09:10
@likhita-809 likhita-809 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 4, 2022 09:10
@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

julienrbrt commented Jul 5, 2022

Should we not backport this to v0.46? Otherwise we added the multi send cli in v0.46 but we remove it a version later.

If we do that we need to update the changelog.

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm but see comment

@likhita-809
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should we not backport this to v0.46? Otherwise we added the multi send cli in v0.46 but we remove it a version later.

If we do that we need to update the changelog.

If we want this to be added, I can add a changelog
I'm not sure if we should backport this to v0.46
Any comments @alexanderbez ?

@alexanderbez
Copy link
Contributor

I honestly don't have any strong feelings about it. It'll be easier to just leave it in v0.46. Do you think that'll be annoying @julienrbrt?

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

I honestly don't have any strong feelings about it. It'll be easier to just leave it in v0.46. Do you think that'll be annoying @julienrbrt?

I wouldn't say annoying, but that is weird if a new feature is added in v0.46 and directly dropped the version after.

@alexanderbez
Copy link
Contributor

What's the new feature?

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

What's the new feature?

#7809 has been implemented in v0.46 rc1. If we were to remove multi-send, then that would have meant adding an extra cli command in v0.46 and removing it altogether in v0.47.

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

Turns out this feature is being used (#12397 (comment)). We won't remove it from the sdk then.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt closed this Jul 5, 2022
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the likhita/remove-multisend branch July 5, 2022 17:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove Bank MsgMultiSend
4 participants