Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DNM: Build matrix: drop 2.7, 3.6; add 3.9, 3.10 #479

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2022
Merged

Conversation

mcg1969
Copy link
Contributor

@mcg1969 mcg1969 commented Dec 31, 2021

https://endoflife.date/python
https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0029-deprecation_policy.html

In theory, we could just expand the build matrix here, without dropping Python 2.7 and Python 3.6. But while I support the continued use of Python 2.7 in legacy code, constructor is not really a legacy application.

@anaconda-issue-bot anaconda-issue-bot added the cla-signed [bot] added once the contributor has signed the CLA label Dec 31, 2021
@mcg1969 mcg1969 force-pushed the build-matrix branch 2 times, most recently from 6afcf3e to db4ccca Compare December 31, 2021 17:42
@mcg1969 mcg1969 changed the title Build matrix: drop 2.7, 3.6; add 3.9, 3.10 DNM: Build matrix: drop 2.7, 3.6; add 3.9, 3.10 Dec 31, 2021
@mcg1969
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcg1969 commented Dec 31, 2021

Looks like Python 3.10 would be premature.

@jaimergp
Copy link
Contributor

jaimergp commented Jan 8, 2022

Is it because it's relying on 3.10 deployment in defaults?

@mcg1969
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcg1969 commented Jan 9, 2022

I have no reason to believe 3.10 won't work. Must be a dependency issue in defaults.

@mcg1969
Copy link
Contributor Author

mcg1969 commented Jan 9, 2022

I actually think it's just our test deps. Should be fixable

@jezdez
Copy link
Member

jezdez commented Jan 11, 2022

Let's skip 3.10 and move 2.7 and 3.6 out for now.

@jezdez jezdez merged commit 6f709b9 into master Feb 10, 2022
@dbast dbast deleted the build-matrix branch December 8, 2022 12:01
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked [bot] locked due to inactivity label Dec 9, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 9, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
cla-signed [bot] added once the contributor has signed the CLA locked [bot] locked due to inactivity
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants