Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Processor Logic for Spatial Transformer #42

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024

Conversation

AnthonyRodway
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request corresponds to the new processor logic in spatial transformer in the issue #18

The new logic will process all of the entries into the data tracker object before processing the spatial files into the output geodatabase. This results in a more consistent workflow and the fallback --resume functionality working better. Geopandas/fiona was also introduced for some of the processing rather than ArcPy for better performance and simplicity.

Changes:

  • Datatracker entries now created when walking through the ripple unzipple output before any spatial processing
  • project spatial id is now calculated based on the highest (latest) project spatial id suffix instead of the number of number of entries for the project number fixing an issue when one gets removed
  • Geopandas/fiona now introduced to some of the spatial and file processing
  • Output geodatabase bug fixes for transferring and creating
  • Added the ability to sort or filter the record reviser, in spatial transformer only entries created in the last day should be showed to reduce the vast amount of entries shown
  • Fixed some locking and deleting errors with the network transfer

@AnthonyRodway AnthonyRodway added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 26, 2024
@AnthonyRodway AnthonyRodway self-assigned this Jun 26, 2024
@AnthonyRodway AnthonyRodway merged commit 935f077 into main Jun 26, 2024
@AnthonyRodway AnthonyRodway deleted the Spatial-Transformer-Processor-Logic-Change branch June 26, 2024 22:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant