Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Update to v2.0.0 #170

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[WIP] Update to v2.0.0 #170

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

yudai-nkt
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't follow the template in this PR, but feel free to correct me.

⚠️ This pull request is WORK IN PROGRESS, hence DO NOT MERGE!

Bunch of changes in each topic branch will get merged here before merging into master. Please refer to this GitHub project for details.

Couple of notes (subject to change if someone has different opinions)

  • Name topic branches v2/<feature> so that we can easily understand the branch is related to version 2.
  • Do not edit CHANGELOG.md because it will mix changes in minor/patch release and the ones in major release (this branch).

@Aerijo
Copy link
Collaborator

Aerijo commented Feb 3, 2018

This version 2 better not take too long, or tree-sitter will be released before we get there ;)

@yudai-nkt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

What is the tree-sitter? If you mean this, I need to learn what it is. 🤔

P.S. I've finished my master defense a few days ago, so I hope I will have some time on this project although there are still several works to get done.

@Aerijo
Copy link
Collaborator

Aerijo commented Feb 3, 2018

Yeah, that. It was mentioned in this blog post under the typing latency section.

There are existing examples for some core languages, such as JS and C, but I still don't know how to write them either. It's still experimental, and I believe regex matching will still be supported though, so it's not entirely necessary to do. I think it's worth investigating though, and wanted to spread awareness of it.

@yudai-nkt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks for the reference and it seems really cool!

I found @yitzchak (one of the contributors here and the collaborator of atom-latex) already prepares a dedicated repository, so maybe we can contribute there.

@Aerijo
Copy link
Collaborator

Aerijo commented Feb 3, 2018

@yudai-nkt I didn't even realise GitHub had a youtube channel. Anyway, this seems to be a good reference for the concepts (given it's presented by the guy who wrote it).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1rC79DHpmY

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants