Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ARCHETYPE-638] maven-archetype pom.xml should add request encoding #129

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

qxo
Copy link

@qxo qxo commented Mar 18, 2023

This commit remove below warning:
[WARNING] Using platform encoding (GBK actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent!

@qxo qxo force-pushed the fix/archetypePomBuildEncoding branch from c55cca9 to ceb3745 Compare March 20, 2023 14:46
@qxo qxo force-pushed the fix/archetypePomBuildEncoding branch from ceb3745 to 941ab44 Compare March 20, 2023 15:35
Copy link
Member

@michael-o michael-o left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this not part of the configurationProperties?

@qxo
Copy link
Author

qxo commented Mar 26, 2023

Why is this not part of the configurationProperties?

I have no idea about that.

@michael-o
Copy link
Member

Why is this not part of the configurationProperties?

I have no idea about that.

Try to evaluate that...

…oding

This commit remove below warning:
[WARNING] Using platform encoding (GBK actually) to copy filtered resources, i.e. build is platform dependent!
@qxo qxo force-pushed the fix/archetypePomBuildEncoding branch from 941ab44 to ec356cb Compare April 4, 2023 14:26
@elharo elharo changed the title [ARCHETYPE-638] - fix: maven-archetype pom.xml should add request encoding [ARCHETYPE-638] maven-archetype pom.xml should add request encoding May 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants