Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SUPPORT] Support the integration with TiCDC #355

Closed
Tracked by #723
SteNicholas opened this issue Aug 24, 2021 · 8 comments
Closed
Tracked by #723

[SUPPORT] Support the integration with TiCDC #355

SteNicholas opened this issue Aug 24, 2021 · 8 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@SteNicholas
Copy link
Member

TiCDC is TiDB's change data capture framework, which supports replicating change data to various downstreams, including MySQL protocol-compatible databases, message queues via the open CDC protocol and other systems such as local file storage.
Does the Flink CDC connector consider to integrate with the TiCDC directly?

@SteNicholas SteNicholas changed the title Support the integration with TiCDC [SUPPORT] Support the integration with TiCDC Aug 24, 2021
@leonardBang leonardBang added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 24, 2021
@findczk
Copy link

findczk commented Aug 31, 2021

+1

@wuchong
Copy link
Member

wuchong commented Sep 3, 2021

https://github.com/TiFlink/TiFlink this is a good project which integrates TiCDC and Flink SQL .

@yangyongyongyong
Copy link

+1

1 similar comment
@a49a
Copy link

a49a commented Sep 18, 2021

+1

@baisui1981
Copy link

+1

@leonardBang leonardBang added this to the V2.2.0 milestone Jan 5, 2022
@DKfengyi
Copy link

+1

@teckick
Copy link
Contributor

teckick commented Feb 10, 2022

Will it support full and incremental migration?

@leonardBang
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicated issue, let's track in #243

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants