Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jdk-17.0.4+8 release triage #3869

Closed
sophia-guo opened this issue Jul 20, 2022 · 14 comments
Closed

jdk-17.0.4+8 release triage #3869

sophia-guo opened this issue Jul 20, 2022 · 14 comments
Assignees

Comments

@sophia-guo
Copy link
Contributor

sophia-guo commented Jul 20, 2022

Release Summary Report for openjdk17-pipeline

Report generated at: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:07:01 GMT

TRSS Build and TRSS Grid View
Jenkins Build URL https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/build-scripts/job/openjdk17-pipeline/463/
Started by user Stewart X Addison at 7/19/2022, 3:43:00 PM


create_installer_mac ❌ undefined ❌

create_installer_windows ❌ undefined ❌

jdk17u-windows-x86-32-temurin ❌ FAILURE ❌

sign_build ❌ undefined ❌

sign_installer ❌ undefined ❌

sign_temurin_gpg ❌ undefined ❌


Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_aarch64_mac ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️

Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_aarch64_mac_testList_0 ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
jdk_jfr_0 => deep history 6/7 passed | possible issues

Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_aarch64_mac_testList_1 ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
jdk_jfr_1 => deep history 5/6 passed | possible issues

See #3869 (comment)

Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_ppc64_aix ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️

Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_ppc64_aix_testList_1 ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
jdk_nio_1 => deep history 2/6 passed | possible issues

See #3869 (comment)

Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_ppc64le_linux ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️

Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_ppc64le_linux_testList_0 ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
jdk_beans_0 => deep history 6/7 passed | possible issues
See #3869 (comment)

Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_x86-64_mac ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️

Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_x86-64_mac_testList_1 ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
jdk_net_1 => deep history 4/7 passed | possible issues

See #3869 (comment)
Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.system_x86-64_mac ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
Rerun all

java -version
openjdk version "17.0.4" 2022-07-19
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.4+8 (build 17.0.4+8)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-17.0.4+8 (build 17.0.4+8, mixed mode, sharing)

ConcurrentLoadTest_5m_0 => deep history 16/17 passed | possible issues

Test_openjdk17_hs_sanity.functional_aarch64_alpine-linux ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
Rerun all

java -version
openjdk version "17.0.4" 2022-07-19
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.4+8 (build 17.0.4+8)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-17.0.4+8 (build 17.0.4+8, mixed mode, sharing)

cmdLineTester_libpathTestRtfChild_0 => deep history 0/16 passed | possible issues

Test_openjdk17_hs_sanity.functional_x86-64_alpine-linux ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
Rerun all

java -version
openjdk version "17.0.4" 2022-07-19
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.4+8 (build 17.0.4+8)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-17.0.4+8 (build 17.0.4+8, mixed mode, sharing)

cmdLineTester_libpathTestRtfChild_0 => deep history 1/14 passed | possible issues

See #3869 (comment)
Test_openjdk17_hs_sanity.openjdk_arm_linux ❌ FAILURE ❌ ✅

Test_openjdk17_hs_sanity.openjdk_ppc64_aix ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
Rerun all

java -version
openjdk version "17.0.4" 2022-07-19
OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-17.0.4+8 (build 17.0.4+8)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-17.0.4+8 (build 17.0.4+8, mixed mode)

jdk_lang_1 => deep history 12/14 passed | possible issues

See #3869 (comment)

Win32 separate pipeline
win32

Release Summary Report for openjdk17-pipeline

Report generated at: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:09:50 GMT

TRSS Build and TRSS Grid View
Jenkins Build URL https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/build-scripts/job/openjdk17-pipeline/465/
Started by user Stewart X Addison at 7/20/2022, 3:55:10 AM


create_installer_windows ❌ undefined ❌

sign_build ❌ undefined ❌

sign_installer ❌ undefined ❌

sign_temurin_gpg ❌ undefined ❌


@sophia-guo sophia-guo changed the title jdk-17.0.4+11 release triage jdk-17.0.4+8 release triage Jul 20, 2022
@sophia-guo
Copy link
Contributor Author

sophia-guo commented Jul 20, 2022

@sophia-guo
Copy link
Contributor Author

sophia-guo commented Jul 20, 2022

@sophia-guo
Copy link
Contributor Author

sophia-guo commented Jul 20, 2022

@sophia-guo
Copy link
Contributor Author

sophia-guo commented Jul 20, 2022

Test_openjdk17_hs_sanity.openjdk_ppc64_aix ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
Rerun all

java/lang/invoke/MethodHandlesSpreadArgumentsTest.java.MethodHandlesSpreadArgumentsTest

java -version
jdk_lang_1 => deep history 12/14 passed | possible issues

Consistently failed

https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/Grinder/5238/

https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/Grinder/5250/

rerun on test-osuosl-aix715-ppc64-3
https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/Grinder/5319/ passed
Grinder_20220728194445.tap.zip

Might be machine issue? recent run failed on test-osuosl-aix715-ppc64-1 consistently. By history, passed on all machines.

@sophia-guo
Copy link
Contributor Author

All issues are under investigation...

@smlambert
Copy link
Contributor

smlambert commented Jul 26, 2022

I hope that someone grabbed the TAP artifacts from the pipelines... as I see that they only get kept for a day or 2 and are now not available from the Jenkins jobs.

We need to add a note to retro regarding this problem of not keeping artifacts, and also have a way to pull artifacts to other storage (releases repo or somewhere, so they are not lost and forcing us to rerun all testing yet again).

@Haroon-Khel
Copy link
Contributor

@sophia-guo
Copy link
Contributor Author

sophia-guo commented Jul 26, 2022

@smlambert I believe the pipeline jobs will keep forever( or long enough) and so do the all artifacts. @sxa I believe you have confirmed this?

April jdk8 release: https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/build-scripts/job/openjdk8-pipeline/2087/artifact/target/

Tap files are also copied to artifacts in pipeline jobs under each platform temurin https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/build-scripts/job/openjdk17-pipeline/463/artifact/target/windows/x64/temurin/AQAvitTaps/, which I believe will be kept forever unless there are secret filters to keep specific artifacts.

Note: specific to release pipeline only

@smlambert
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @sophia-guo - That is great to hear, I was having trouble finding them last night (indicating time to get some sleep).

@sophia-guo
Copy link
Contributor Author

All done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants