Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WP 6.3-beta3 front-page template shows static page on initial loading #52388

Closed
wpsoul opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 23 comments
Closed

WP 6.3-beta3 front-page template shows static page on initial loading #52388

wpsoul opened this issue Jul 6, 2023 · 23 comments
Labels
[Feature] Site Editor Related to the overarching Site Editor (formerly "full site editing") [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended

Comments

@wpsoul
Copy link

wpsoul commented Jul 6, 2023

Description

As I understand, we have now two options in FSE themes: home.html template and front-page.html. If theme has home.html template, then Settings - reading option is used on front page of site. If front-page, then settings - reading is ignored and only front-page is used

In 6.3 beta, if theme uses front-page.html and if I visit /wp-admin/site-editor.php I see empty screen. And it looks like now it uses settings - reading setup which has no sense, because on Frontend side, front-page template is used.

Step-by-step reproduction instructions

  1. Install any theme which has front-page.html (for example, Greenshift)
  2. Set static page in settings - reading
  3. Visit /wp-admin/site-editor.php
  4. I expect to see front-page template. Instead of this, I see empty screen or screen of static page

Screenshots, screen recording, code snippet

No response

Environment info

  • 6.3 beta 3 version of WP

Please confirm that you have searched existing issues in the repo.

Yes

Please confirm that you have tested with all plugins deactivated except Gutenberg.

Yes

@wpsoul wpsoul changed the title WP 6.3-beta3 front-page template shows static page instead WP 6.3-beta3 front-page template shows static page on initial loading Jul 6, 2023
@annezazu annezazu added Needs Testing Needs further testing to be confirmed. [Feature] Site Editor Related to the overarching Site Editor (formerly "full site editing") labels Jul 6, 2023
@annezazu
Copy link
Contributor

annezazu commented Jul 6, 2023

Nearly positive this is a duplicate of #52266 on second glance. Can you confirm @wpsoul ?

@wpsoul
Copy link
Author

wpsoul commented Jul 7, 2023

Not exactly. That ticket describes workflow when Home template is existed (for example in 2023 theme), but my scenario is about Frontpage. If I have next in theme, options in Settings - reading must be ignored and I must have Front Page template when I open site editor. This way it worked in 6.2

templates 2023-07-07 02-59-02

@annezazu
Copy link
Contributor

@ramonjd in case you can take a look!

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jul 11, 2023

Nearly positive this is a duplicate of #52266 on second glance.

Yeah, despite the very misleading title, that PR was a little different in that it related specifically to the pages list.

I've tested the steps described in this issue on WordPress 6.3-beta3-5619 with both Gutenberg 16.2 activated and deactivated and can reproduce using the Greenshift theme. Checked a few others. Porcupine works.

Greenshift has a lot of block validation errors:

Screenshot 2023-07-11 at 12 46 21 pm

So when I remove most of those blocks from the front page template, it loads

Screenshot 2023-07-11 at 12 49 14 pm

emptytheme, 2023, 2022 load well. I tested by both:

  • Creating a front-page template via the Site Editor template management page, and
  • Creating a front-page.html in my theme directory

@wpsoul
Copy link
Author

wpsoul commented Jul 12, 2023

I retested on latest beta build. Error with wrong front page template is gone. I found validation errors, but it looks like bug from core. Custom image size now is rendered also in style tag. I see this bug not only in theme, but in many patterns, for example

fronts

@wpsoul
Copy link
Author

wpsoul commented Jul 12, 2023

Found where this block. It's in Woocommerce pattern which is called "Testimonial Single"

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jul 12, 2023

Nice sleuthing @wpsoul

The styles were introduced in #51545 here

I think it should have added a deprecation cc @ajlende

Here's the template: https://github.com/woocommerce/woocommerce-blocks/blob/trunk/patterns/testimonials-single.php

Running this through 6.3 Beta:

Content generated by save function:

<figure class="wp-block-image alignleft size-large is-resized has-custom-border is-style-rounded"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/5.8/portrait.jpg" alt="" style="border-radius:100%;width:164px;height:164px" width="164" height="164"/></figure>

Content retrieved from post body:

<figure class="wp-block-image alignleft size-large is-resized has-custom-border is-style-rounded"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/5.8/portrait.jpg" alt="" style="border-radius:100%" width="164" height="164"/></figure>

@jordesign
Copy link
Contributor

@ramonjd Just looping back to this one - as notes in #51545 suggest this is a different issue?

@jordesign jordesign added [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended and removed Needs Testing Needs further testing to be confirmed. labels Jul 18, 2023
@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jul 18, 2023

Thanks @jordesign

Confirmed, what I said above was bunk.

Explanation here:

This is part of edit, not save, so it shouldn't affect block deprecations. In a follow-up #52286, @draganescu added styles to save, but he did add a deprecation for them.

@draganescu
Copy link
Contributor

@ramonjd is thre anything wrong with #52286? Once the content is migrated do the errors persist? I did add a deprecation wihich does not include the style. Maybe I forgiot to do something (I am constantly unsure about deprecations).

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jul 19, 2023

@ramonjd is thre anything wrong with #52286? Once the content is migrated do the errors persist? I did add a deprecation wihich does not include the style. Maybe I forgiot to do something (I am constantly unsure about deprecations

Thanks for the ping! I didn't have time to debug any of the deprecations, so I couldn't tell where it was coming from. I just leapt to a conclusion that the latest style additions were related.

I'll try to test again. Deprecations turn my brain to mashed potato.

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jul 21, 2023

@draganescu

So I think #52286 did introduce the validation error despite the deprecation.

To test, add a v6 image block to a post via the code editor and save:

<!-- wp:image {"align":"left","width":164,"height":164,"sizeSlug":"large","style":{"border":{"radius":"100%"}},"className":"is-style-rounded"} -->
<figure class="wp-block-image alignleft size-large is-resized has-custom-border is-style-rounded"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/5.8/portrait.jpg" alt="" style="border-radius:100%" width="164" height="164"/></figure>
<!-- /wp:image -->

You'll see the deprecation warning.

Block validation: Block validation failed for `core/image` ({name: 'core/image', icon: {…}, keywords: Array(3), attributes: {…}, providesContext: {…}, …}).

Content generated by `save` function:

<figure class="wp-block-image alignleft size-large is-resized has-custom-border is-style-rounded"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/5.8/portrait.jpg" alt="" style="border-radius:100%;width:164px;height:164px" width="164" height="164"/></figure>

Content retrieved from post body:

<figure class="wp-block-image alignleft size-large is-resized has-custom-border is-style-rounded"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/5.8/portrait.jpg" alt="" style="border-radius:100%" width="164" height="164"/></figure>

Then remove the changes from #52286

diff --git a/packages/block-library/src/image/save.js b/packages/block-library/src/image/save.js
index 6fa8c6b234..95e8803dd6 100644
--- a/packages/block-library/src/image/save.js
+++ b/packages/block-library/src/image/save.js
@@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ export default function save( { attributes } ) {
 				...borderProps.style,
 				aspectRatio,
 				objectFit: scale,
-				width,
-				height,
 			} }
 			width={ width }
 			height={ height }

The warning is gone.

I suspect we need to migrate the markup changes, but it's tricky because the save function doesn't return a valid block, so I couldn't test things out with migrate/isEligible. Plus, I'm not sure here, but manipulating attributes or innerBlocks might not work because:

  1. The attributes haven't changed, only the application of them to the <img /> markup
  2. There are no innerBlocks/innerBlockProps

I think we'd also need to add attributes and supports to the v6 deprecation?

I've done a few deprecations in the past but I wouldn't class myself as an expert here. I might ask around.

@ndiego
Copy link
Member

ndiego commented Jul 24, 2023

@ramonjd can this be considered complete when #52822 and #52853 are backported?

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jul 24, 2023

can this be considered complete when #52822 and #52853 are backported?

Thanks for the ping. Yes, that sounds about right. I should have added the backport to RC label to #52822 sooner, but I'll make sure it features in the next round.

@tellthemachines
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this one because the Image block deprecation fixes were added to core in 6.3 RC2. Thanks everyone!

@wpsoul
Copy link
Author

wpsoul commented Jul 30, 2023

I return back to my initial bug report. Tried actual 6.3 Nightly and bug is returned back

One more time. If I have FrontPage template in block theme, Site editor must show Front Template on initial loading. Currently, it shows page from Settings - Reading - Homepage which has no sense because this page is not used on frontend side.

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jul 31, 2023

If I have FrontPage template in block theme, Site editor must show Front Template on initial loading. Currently, it shows page from Settings - Reading - Homepage which has no sense because this page is not used on frontend side.

Could you give details about the front-page template you're using?

I've tested with the most basic set up, by creating a new front-page.html with the following content:

<!-- wp:heading {"level":1} -->
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Front page</h1>
<!-- /wp:heading -->

And it always overrides the Settings > Reading settings in the editor and frontend. So I suspect it might be specific to the front-page template?

@wpsoul
Copy link
Author

wpsoul commented Jul 31, 2023

And it always overrides the Settings > Reading settings in the editor and frontend. So I suspect it might be specific to the front-page template?

Ok, so, the situation is even worse. If front-page.html uses just static content, it works. But if it uses patterns or template parts, it doesn't work

<!-- wp:pattern {"slug":"greenshift/footer-default"} /-->

or

<!-- wp:template-part {"slug":"header","tagName":"header","className":"site-header"} /-->

but if I copy content from header template part and insert it directly in front-page.html, then it works

so, wp:pattern and wp:template-part (any of this) will break site editor initial loading. In the same time, if I select Front template in editor, then it works correctly

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jul 31, 2023

I wonder if it's related to #52983

@wpsoul
Copy link
Author

wpsoul commented Jul 31, 2023

I wonder if it's related to #52983

No. In my case, template is working if I open it in editor. Problem is only in initial loading which doesn’t show Frontpage if template has pattern

@wpsoul
Copy link
Author

wpsoul commented Aug 1, 2023

The latest build made everything even worse. Now, it shows Front-page template on initial loading, but you can't edit anything in the content area

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Aug 2, 2023

Here's what I'm seeing:

2023-08-02.11.52.16.mp4

Is this happening on other themes for you as well?

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Aug 2, 2023

Oh I think the fix was included in the latest round of cherry picking for 6.3:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Feature] Site Editor Related to the overarching Site Editor (formerly "full site editing") [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants