In what situation does BasedMovement handling necessary for als camera component?

[ameaninglessname]

I couldn't see a difference after hard-coded bMovementBaseHasRelativeRotation to false with UCharacterMovementComponent::bIgnoreBaseRotation set to false when standing on B_Als_RotatingObject 🤔 (relative rotation is unchanged in both case)

the relative code starts here (so the code looks unnecessary):
https://github.com/Sixze/ALS-Refactored/blob/main/Source/ALSCamera/Private/AlsCameraComponent.cpp#L170-L171

[Sixze]

There is a difference, as the camera will start rotating along with B_Als_RotatingObject, thus keeping its relative rotation unchanged if bIgnoreBaseRotation is off.

[ameaninglessname]

Yes, you're right.
And sorry, there was some key omissions in my description, just updated.

[Sixze]

Press Shift+7 to enable camera debug shapes, and you'll see that in one case they follow the rotating character with some delay, and in the other case they don't, because all camera calculations are done relative to the rotating platform.

[ameaninglessname]

Thanks! ♥ I got that.