Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't use unwrap after calling Span.join #25

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Aaron1011
Copy link

The method Span.join will return None if the start and end Spans
are from different files. This is currently difficult to observe in
practice due to rust-lang/rust#43081, which causes span information
(including file information) to be lost in many cases.

However, PR rust-lang/rust#73084 will cause Spans to be properly
preserved in many more cases. This will cause rocket to to stop
compiling, as this code will end up getting hit with spans from
different files (one from rocket, and one from the result ident
defined in the pear_try! macro.

To reproduce the issue:

  1. Checkout SergioBenitez/Rocket#63a4ae048540a6232c3c7c186e9d027081940382
  2. Install https://github.com/kennytm/rustup-toolchain-install-master if
    you don't already have it
  3. Run rustup-toolchain-install-master 879b8cb7dc2ad9102994457e73cf78d124926ea5
    (this corresponds to the latest commit from Re-land PR #72388: Recursively expand TokenKind::Interpolated in probably_equal_for_proc_macro rust-lang/rust#73084)
  4. From the Rocket checkout, run cargo +879b8cb7dc2ad9102994457e73cf78d124926ea5 build
  5. Observe the panic from Pear

I've based this PR on the commit for Pear 0.1.2, since the master
branch has many breaking changes. I would recommend merging this change
into a separate branch, and making a new 0.1.3 point release.

The method `Span.join` will return `None` if the start and end `Span`s
are from different files. This is currently difficult to observe in
practice due to rust-lang/rust#43081, which causes span information
(including file information) to be lost in many cases.

However, PR rust-lang/rust#73084 will cause `Spans` to be properly
preserved in many more cases. This will cause `rocket` to to stop
compiling, as this code will end up getting hit with spans from
different files (one from rocket, and one from the `result` ident
defined in the `pear_try!` macro.

To reproduce the issue:

1. Checkout SergioBenitez/Rocket#63a4ae048540a6232c3c7c186e9d027081940382
2. Install https://github.com/kennytm/rustup-toolchain-install-master if
   you don't already have it
3. Run `rustup-toolchain-install-master 879b8cb7dc2ad9102994457e73cf78d124926ea5`
   (this corresponds to the latest commit from rust-lang/rust#73084)
4. From the `Rocket` checkout, run `cargo +879b8cb7dc2ad9102994457e73cf78d124926ea5 build`
5. Observe the panic from `Pear`

I've based this PR on the commit for `Pear 0.1.2`, since the master
branch has many breaking changes. I would recommend merging this change
into a separate branch, and making a new `0.1.3` point release.
@SergioBenitez
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for this incredibly thoughtful PR. I sincerely appreciate it. I've merged this in a new v0.1 branch in 5b6a4ed with minor style changes. I've also published 0.1.3.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2020
…ture, r=petrochenkov

Always capture tokens for `macro_rules!` arguments

When we invoke a proc-macro, the `TokenStream` we pass to it may contain 'interpolated' AST fragments, represented by `rustc_ast::token::Nonterminal`. In order to correctly, pass a `Nonterminal` to a proc-macro, we need to have 'captured' its `TokenStream` at the time the AST was parsed.

Currently, we perform this capturing when attributes are present on items and expressions, since we will end up using a `Nonterminal` to pass the item/expr to any proc-macro attributes it is annotated with. However, `Nonterminal`s are also introduced by the expansion of metavariables in `macro_rules!` macros. Since these metavariables may be passed to proc-macros, we need to have tokens available to avoid the need to pretty-print and reparse (see rust-lang#43081).

This PR unconditionally performs token capturing for AST items and expressions that are passed to a `macro_rules!` invocation. We cannot know in advance if captured item/expr will be passed to proc-macro, so this is needed to ensure that tokens will always be available when they are needed.

This ensures that proc-macros will receive tokens with proper `Spans` (both location and hygiene) in more cases. Like all work on rust-lang#43081, this will cause regressions in proc-macros that were relying on receiving tokens with dummy spans.

In this case, Crater revealed only one regression: the [Pear](https://github.com/SergioBenitez/Pear) crate (a helper for [rocket](https://github.com/SergioBenitez/Rocket)), which was previously [fixed](SergioBenitez/Pear#25) as part of rust-lang#73084.

This regression manifests itself as the following error:

```
[INFO] [stdout] error: proc macro panicked
[INFO] [stdout]    --> /opt/rustwide/cargo-home/registry/src/github.51.al-1ecc6299db9ec823/rocket_http-0.4.5/src/parse/uri/parser.rs:119:34
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout] 119 |             let path_and_query = pear_try!(path_and_query(is_pchar));
[INFO] [stdout]     |                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[INFO] [stdout]     |
[INFO] [stdout]     = help: message: called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value
[INFO] [stdout]     = note: this error originates in a macro (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```

It can be fixed by running `cargo update -p pear`, which updates your `Cargo.lock` to use the latest version of Pear (which includes a bugfix for the regression).

Split out from rust-lang#73084
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants