Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use CircleCI workflows #3993

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 22, 2020
Merged

Conversation

layershifter
Copy link
Member

@layershifter layershifter commented Jul 22, 2020

This PR updates existing CircleCI config to run test and lint jobs in parallel. Also provides some minor updates to config:

  • use Node 12
  • remove yarn install as it is included to Docker image
  • code coverage is reported earlier to get reports faster

Inspired by yarnpkg/yarn#4271.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 22, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #3993 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3993   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.84%   99.84%           
=======================================
  Files         183      183           
  Lines        3157     3157           
=======================================
  Hits         3152     3152           
  Misses          5        5           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 488bbee...45d9686. Read the comment docs.

@layershifter layershifter merged commit 83c2ce4 into master Jul 22, 2020
@layershifter layershifter changed the title chore: use CircleCI workflows [WIP] chore: use CircleCI workflows Jul 22, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the chore/use-circle-ci-workflows branch July 22, 2020 09:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants