Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix/same user minter #568

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 24, 2022

Conversation

abdullahjankhan1
Copy link
Contributor

@abdullahjankhan1 abdullahjankhan1 commented May 23, 2022

Description

Creator of recipe cannot mint the recipe.

Closes: https://pylonstech.atlassian.net/browse/PS-334


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@faisalnaveedRNS faisalnaveedRNS changed the title Fix/same user minter fix/same user minter May 23, 2022
Copy link

@mustafapylons mustafapylons left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple of comments, also CI/CD has to pass.

@@ -27,6 +27,24 @@ func TestSetItemString(t *testing.T) {
executedItemID := "testItemID"
itemMutableStringField := "itemMutableStringField"
itemMutableStringValue := "itemMutableStringValue"
accs := GenerateAddressesInKeyring(val.ClientCtx.Keyring, 2)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"2" in this statement and following repetitions can be replaced with constant variable.

@@ -27,6 +27,24 @@ func TestSetItemString(t *testing.T) {
executedItemID := "testItemID"
itemMutableStringField := "itemMutableStringField"
itemMutableStringValue := "itemMutableStringValue"
accs := GenerateAddressesInKeyring(val.ClientCtx.Keyring, 2)
common := []string{
fmt.Sprintf("--%s=%s", flags.FlagFrom, accs[0].String()),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

accs[0] has been repeated throughout the code and position "0" can be replaced with constant as well.

common := []string{
fmt.Sprintf("--%s=%s", flags.FlagFrom, val.Address.String()),
common = []string{
fmt.Sprintf("--%s=%s", flags.FlagFrom, accs[0].String()),
fmt.Sprintf("--%s=true", flags.FlagSkipConfirmation),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

multiple code blocks have been copy pasted, code reuse can be emphasized.

Copy link

@mustafapylons mustafapylons left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me after the changes.

@faisalnaveedRNS faisalnaveedRNS removed their request for review May 24, 2022 11:50
@MikeSofaer MikeSofaer merged commit 5da191e into Pylons-tech:main May 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants