Use a reasonable size of the backlog for the extension server socket #36
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
As a curiosity, a value of 0 is used in combination with having |
Using value 0 was causing the following message in linux logs: TCP: request_sock_TCP: Possible SYN flooding on port 9999...
|
After some investigation, I can say that It's not clear what's the meaning of value 0, it seems like a "supported" bug |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since python 3.5, the backlog parameter is optional and it will
use a default reasonable value. Using value 0 was causing the
following message in linux logs:
TCP: request_sock_TCP: Possible SYN flooding on port 9999...